Blog

Fish Tank and An Education – In a Class of Their Own

Fish Tank and An Education – In a Class of Their Own

What social comparisons can be drawn between two of the best of British from the class of '09?

Related reviews and interviews

Lone Scherfig’s glamourous BBC film An Education and Andrea Arnold’s realist social-anatomy Fish Tank are perhaps the most successful and consistently praised British films of last year, and are now Britain’s last line of defence against the juggernaut of Avatar rumbling slowly towards a sustained sweep and clear of every awards show in sight. But despite their stark differences in setting, period and style, the films are ostensibly very similar.

Both films feature gently subversive subject matter. They both, in Michael Fassbender and Peter Sarsgaard, contain troubled, predatory and egregiously male performances. They both introduce, in sensational style, two very fine young actresses in Carey Mulligan and Katie Jarvis who, in their separate ways, rage against the confines of their upbringing. And both films illustrate different layers of a very resilient and entrenched British class system.

An Education fetishises the period glamour of the early ’60s as ardently as its heroine, it is as much an affirmation of middle-class culture as a critique. Mulligan’s Jenny may feel trapped within the boundaries of her cloyingly anxious suburban upbringing, but she also uses it as a secure nest to which she can return.

By revolving the film to such a degree around this bright young thing, the film communicates a simple but enduring message – Jenny can do anything she wants with her life. She has the intelligence, the charm, the capacity and, most importantly, the social structures to support her. Despite Sarsgaard’s ‘education’ in transgression, the world remains her oyster.

In Fish Tank, the milieu of Mia’s life – the grey, graffiti’d uniformity of her domiciled home, the rubbish on the streets and the rot on TV – is the visual upholstering to a cripplingly low glass ceiling. In comparison to Mulligan’s character, Katie Jarvis’s Mia has nothing she can rely on, nobody to support her or decide how her life will pan out. When she tears up her housing estate, or dances alone with only her private aspirations for company, there is only one consistent surety. This place has been marginalised by society and, as a result, she will struggle to leave it. Her confusion, impulsiveness and anger, it seems, are wholly justified.

The careers of these two new actresses will be interesting to follow. Mulligan is a privately educated girl from an affluent background who got her break from Julian Fellowes when he invited her to dinner before hooking her up with a well established casting agent, who has so far secured her six films which are all currently in pre-production.

Jarvis is an untrained actor plucked straight out of the Essex housing estates in which the film is set. In what sounds like a beautiful moment of serendipity, she was spotted by the film’s casting assistant having an argument with her boyfriend at Tilbury train station. It is hoped she will be on our screens for years to come but, in this most nepotistic of industries, her future may regrettably be less sure.

In the lead-up to the election, both of Britain’s main political partners are battling over class lines. Cameron will continue to expound his ‘broken Britain’ rhetoric, suggesting that every murder, rape and abuse is a further example of his theory. Brown will preach the value of meritocracy whilst attempting to convince that his liberally-minded manipulation of capitalism is still a valid post-recession model. In truth, both approaches are deeply flawed.

An Education and Fish Tank are stylistically divergent parables of innocence lost. But, despite their differences, they provide a unified message; Britain’s societal structures are prone to perpetuate and, for good or for worse, are going nowhere fast.

Tom Seymour

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments (1)

  • I'm not sure what this says about me, but the thing I took from watching both films are the way they explore how intense male desire and the associated compulsion to decieve can play havoc with our ability to interact normally. The films are from female perspectives but could just have easily been about Sargaard and Fassbender's characters.

    Written by Toby on February 1st, 2010 at 09:56

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Follow us on Twitter
latest comments
  • I found the story of Big Fish Games fascinating. I wanted to keep playing it just so I could see how it would...
    Chung Hernander Funny Games
  • I think the relationship between Bad Blake and Tommy Sweet is self-explanatory and has a lot of depth in the film. We...
  • I did actually mention Maya Deren's films, as well as Dali/Bunuel-Un Chien Andalou – for some reason...
    Thom Harris Art On Film
  • A fine piece if you ask me, I think it's got a good amount of depth for the length and plenty of names for...
    Thom Harris Art On Film