Blog

On Richard Curtis

On Richard Curtis

Robin Harrison considers the merits of one of Britain's most successful filmmakers. Turns out there aren't very many...

Related reviews and interviews

Right, let’s do a little survey. Hands up who saw The Boat That Rocked. You know the film I’m talking about, it was Richard Curtis’ second feature as director. You can put your hands down. Okay. Now hands up who enjoyed it. Keep your hands raised. And finally, put those mitts to good use by giving yourself a hard slap in the face. Survey over.

From the godawful first series of Blackadder to his latest cinematic aberration, Richard Curtis has dribbled a slimy, offensively inoffensive stream of chummy tedium all down the bib of British cinema, aided and abetted by a gang of talented performers that really should have known better.

Just think about it; In Four Weddings and Notting Hill, he hangs the British public out to dry as a rabble of fey, self-consciously quirky tosspots, the kind you’d expect to see on a Dorito’s advert. Seeing the mess he’s made, he parachutes in a glam American clothespeg for the tosspot with the floppiest hair to moon over before finally settling down with her and spawning the next generation of fey, self-consciously quirky tosspots.

I’m not a fan.

Still, Curtis’ first two successes as a writer seemed like masterpieces when he vomited out his directorial debut Love Actually. If we overlook the standard romantic dirge, and the fact that the title is a shortened version of ‘Love Actually Is All Around’ (a sentence mawkish enough to make even the starry-eyed romantics grind their teeth into powder with fury), we’re left with a collection of characters so utterly reprehensible you’d have to stick a few prisons together to get their real-world equivalent. There’s Alan Rickman languidly pondering an affair while Emma Thompson crumbles around him; Keira Knightley and Andrew Lincoln snooping around behind Chiwetel Ejiofor’s back and, of course, a floppy-haired tosspot, who, like a Mr Ben rip-off, has become Prime Minister. Finally we get an interesting American parachuted in, but Billy Bob Thornton’s president is quickly dismissed, lest anything controversial should emerge, so that tosspot can go and rut with his cockernee cleaning lady. In front of a nativity play audience. The nation heaves a collective heave as stomach contents from Oxford to Orkney splatter over living room carpets.

Floppy-haired tosspot and cockernee cleaning lady bring me handily to my next source of Curtis-rage: his social conscience. Yes, it’s Comic Relief. Comic Relief. Comic Relief. Say it out loud. The more you say it, it starts to sound like a euphemism for losing control of your bowels in a public place. Doesn’t it? Tell your friends. If you have an attention span as bad as mine, the fun-at-gunpoint ‘antics’ (and anything which can be described with the word ‘antics’ should have been euthanised at birth) and true-life horror stories of abuse, famine and genocide can start to blend into one, to the point where you’ve no idea what you’re meant to be laughing about. ‘Ooh, look it’s Vernon Kay in a hilarious meat-slicer sketch, hee-hee’ one minute, quickly lapsing into ‘…and so Emma will never be seen again.’ By the end, supposing you make it that far, you’ll be guffawing at the emaciated children in Africa, as flies land on their faces to drink the tears trickling down their sunken cheeks. And it’s all thanks to you-know-who.

Now I’m probably coming across as a mean-spirited, misanthropic puddle of human venom (which I am), so I’ll attempt to add some balance and add in a quote of Curtis trying to defend his work. Asked (I assume) as to why his films are rubbish, sentimental and unrealistic, he said:

“If you write a story about a soldier going AWOL and kidnapping a pregnant woman and finally shooting her in the head, it’s called searingly realistic, even though it’s never happened in the history of mankind. Whereas if you write about two people falling in love, which happens about a million times a day all over the world, for some reason or another, you’re accused of writing something unrealistic and sentimental.”

And, to be fair, he does have a point. Millions of people fall in love a million times a day all over the world. Same goes for people falling out of love. People killing each other. People finding out they have irritable bowel syndrome. And a soldier has never gone AWOL, kidnapped a pregnant woman and finally shot her in the head? This coming from the man who set up Comic Relief, attempting to cure the ills of Africa and help countries there recover from years of war and genocide? I mean, is he actually sending the money there, or just floppy-hair wigs and tea?

So Richard Curtis makes us look like wimpy idiots in front of the Yanks (it’s fair to assume that ‘the special relationship’ was based on Bush watching Notting Hill), made a film whose title was short for ‘Love Actually Is All Around’ and makes us laugh at the misfortune of Africans during Comic Relief. AND The Boat That Rocked has made over $17 million before it’s released in America. Those of you out there whose faces are smarting from that well-deserved slap, when the DVD comes out, resist the urge. Don’t you dare buy it; barricade yourself inside, smash your computers and wait until the urge passes. I’m warning you.

Robin Harrison

Printer friendly version Printer friendly version rss icon RSS feed for comments

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments (6)

  • This sounds eerily like something from Charlie Brooker (which can only be a good thing).
    On the subject of this: "soldier going AWOL and kidnapping a pregnant woman and finally shooting her in the head, it’s called searingly realistic", it may be called searingly realistic as it tackles real genuine human emotion rather than some boring predictable, albeit possibly more realistic, faux love story.

    Written by doug1482 on July 15th, 2009 at 10:57

  • Blackadder 2-4 are brilliantly written. It's true that this may have been more to do with Ben Elton being introduced as a writer after the fairly dire first series (Ben Elton is someone else who has fallen into similar disrepute) but one should still acknowledge Curtis' involvement. Mr Bean had its moments too.

    Written by Matt Poke on July 15th, 2009 at 12:51

  • I am not a big fan of Curtis, though he is perhaps limited to smaltziness becuase the genre he has chosen to work in, however "early " Woody Allen did a better job at doing romatic comedies. I agree with Matt, Blackadder had great pieces of dialogue where Elton and Curtis must be praised. I don't think his films are that bad, I just dont think that they should be a British export. James Bond, Shane Meadows, Mike Leigh yes., we should just keep Curtis in the UK. Great read, reallyfrustrating. I share your pain Robin!!!

    Written by Marlon C Dolcy on July 15th, 2009 at 14:55

  • "however "early " Woody Allen did a better job at doing romatic comedies."
    Even new Woodey Allen is miles ahead of Curtis. But as with both above posts, I must admit to being a fan of blackadder 2-4

    Written by doug1482 on July 16th, 2009 at 15:29

  • Criticise the man for his work in films, that's fine… he deserves it. I think it displays an absurdly large amount of foolishness to criticise his work with Comic Relief. Whether Vernon Kay makes you laugh or not shouldn't take away from the fact that were it not for Richard Curtis and his team, some of the poorest nations in Africa would have been many more millions of pounds worse off. He is responsible for a lot of good in this world whether his films are a turgid mess or not (and they really are). Isn't it terrible when people want to try and make things better and actually, against all odds, manage to do so?!

    Written by JW Smith on July 17th, 2009 at 20:59

  • I couldn't agree more. Whether you like Richards Curtis' films or not, and quite clearly a lot of people do, Robin's article seems like a cheap shot at the valuable contribution he's made to very worthwhile charitable causes. From a cynical perspective, yes I’m sure his work with Comic Relief will not have done any harm to his reputation and box office sales but is this so bad? Amusing as it is to read, the bombastic and rather naive views expressed here are an insult to the many thousands of people who’ve donated their money to Comic Relief over the years.
    Anyhow what is the significance of writing this now? The DVD isn’t released here until September and it’s not released in US cinemas till November. Maybe you should consider saving your vitriol for a more suitable time. All that being said, I echo your views on his saccharine ‘attempts’ at cinema, he should really stick to TV, dare I say it, I quite enjoyed The Vicar of Dibley.

    Written by Josh Savage on July 21st, 2009 at 20:50

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Follow us on Twitter
latest comments
  • Dissapointing…a bit to much interference from the Disney Suits perhaps?
  • I must pay out our mortgage at the end in the month but do not think that I may make it, are you able to...
    Tim Gansburg Happy-Go-Lucky
  • Surely you're not in any way suggesting that Susan Boyle is the love child of Susan Sarandon and Peter Boyle…...
    Anton Bitel Joe