Blog

The 2009 And/Or Book Award

The 2009 And/Or Book Award

The award for the best book published in the fields of photography and the moving image will be announced tonight. But what would be your choice?

Related reviews and interviews

Boxing migrant workers, CGI and X-rays are the subjects covered in the shortlist for this year’s And/Or Book Award, the UK’s leading prize for books published in the fields of photography and the moving image. The winner from each category will share the prize fund of £10,000, and they’ll be announced tonight at the BFI Southbank.

Over 150 titles from last year have been whittled down to the final seven, three of which are in the moving image category. The first is Photography and Cinema by writer, artist and Reader in Photography at the University of Westminster, David Campany. Illustrated with over 127 images, the book considers the importance of the photograph in the evolution of film, and the relationship between the still image and filmmakers, while asking questions about what the arrival of cinema did for photography, how moving images changed our relation to the still image and why cinema and photography are drawn to each other.

Films revolving around a boxing ring and the characters in it are always ripe pickings for entertainment – nothing can beat the emotional climax of a bloodied and beaten working man’s hero who’s been to hell and back. That rush of entertainment harks back to 1897, and the first filmed prizefight, Veriscope’s The Corbett-Fitzsimmons Fight. It became one of cinema’s earliest major attractions and began an era of successful boxing films that changed it from a sport into legitimate entertainment. Dan Streible’s Fight Pictures: A History of Boxing and Early Cinema chronicles the near forgotten story of how fights, fake bouts, sparring matches and silent era pictures became engrained in American popular culture.

There was a time when it was all too easy to spot some dodgy special effects that resemble something made out of cardboard, but as the years roll by it’s becoming more and more difficult to spot what’s CGI and what isn’t (check out the DVD extras on Zodiac for proof of that). Film’s ability to create an illusion is constantly evolving far beyond the other worlds created by studio sets decades ago, to the point where green screens will probably soon be irrelevant. Performing Illusions: Cinema, Special Effects and the Virtual Actor by University of Exeter film lecturer Dan North examines film’s creative history of special effects and trickery from George Méliès’ first trick films to the modern CGI era.

For more info visit the website. We’ll have a follow up report announcing the winner later this week.

Obviously the And/Or award veers towards the academic market, but what would be your choice for the best movie related book you’ve ever read?

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments (3)

  • If you're talking about great movie books, it;s hard to get past Peter Biskind's 'Easy Riders, Raging Bulls' – the story of how New Hollywood came to be in the late 60s/early 70s. Although most of the people quoted in the book have since claimed that he made it up. Probably because he portrays everybody as basically being a coked up egomaniac. He wrote one about the 50s too (forget the name) that was great as well.

    Also, I recently read a Walt Disney bio by Neal Gabler that was fascinating. It painted a portrait of Disney as a guy who was never really satisfied with the quality of the studio's work after Snow White, and who was always reaching for this impossible ideal. Showed him as a really mercurial figure and got past a lot of the myths – cryogenics and being a Nazi and that stuff.

    Written by Richard Taylor on April 23rd, 2009 at 13:50

  • Phaidon do some amazing stuff. I've got a couple of their 'decade' film books (can't remember what they're called exactly). They just break down a decade of films – beautiful images, well designed, amazing packages. Also, their Orson Welles book is brilliant: http://www.phaidon.com/Default.aspx/Web/orson-wel...

    Written by Rusty on April 24th, 2009 at 10:59

  • It's not Phaidon it's Taschen…and I've met Peter Biskind and he's a dim cock! Do you really think that the reasons 'Jaws' 'Taxi Driver' and 'Raging Bull' are so resonant is because everyone involved was on drugs?
    They were great because the people who made them were hungry and talented…

    Written by Phil Huntley on April 24th, 2009 at 20:12

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Follow us on Twitter
latest comments
  • Joe Carnahan must lie awake at night and wonder where it all went wrong. Narc was such a good low budget noir, with...
    tomseymour The A-Team
  • Fuck me. Matt Bochenski, you must be a barrel of laughs at a party you humorless critic you.
    Snake-Eyes The A-Team
  • The announcement was very badly handled and not at all clear regarding administering the film tax credits...
  • Problem is that Stone thinks he can throw his opinions round without having to worry about consequence. He...