<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 2009 And/Or Book Award</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/blog/the-2009-onoff-book-award-the-nominees-are/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/blog/the-2009-onoff-book-award-the-nominees-are/</link>
	<description>Little White Lies is a bi-monthly, independent movie magazine that features cutting edge writing, illustration and photography to get under the skin of cinema.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:15:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Huntley</title>
		<link>http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/blog/the-2009-onoff-book-award-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-10170</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Huntley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/?p=4480#comment-10170</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not Phaidon it&#039;s Taschen...and I&#039;ve met Peter Biskind and he&#039;s a dim cock! Do you really think that the reasons &#039;Jaws&#039; &#039;Taxi Driver&#039; and &#039;Raging Bull&#039; are so resonant is because everyone involved was on drugs? 
They were great because the people who made them were hungry and talented... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s not Phaidon it&#039;s Taschen&#8230;and I&#039;ve met Peter Biskind and he&#039;s a dim cock! Do you really think that the reasons &#039;Jaws&#039; &#039;Taxi Driver&#039; and &#039;Raging Bull&#039; are so resonant is because everyone involved was on drugs?<br />
They were great because the people who made them were hungry and talented&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/blog/the-2009-onoff-book-award-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-10145</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/?p=4480#comment-10145</guid>
		<description>Phaidon do some amazing stuff. I&#039;ve got a couple of their &#039;decade&#039; film books (can&#039;t remember what they&#039;re called exactly). They just break down a decade of films - beautiful images, well designed, amazing packages. Also, their Orson Welles book is brilliant: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phaidon.com/Default.aspx/Web/orson-welles-at-work-9780714845838&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.phaidon.com/Default.aspx/Web/orson-wel...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phaidon do some amazing stuff. I&#039;ve got a couple of their &#039;decade&#039; film books (can&#039;t remember what they&#039;re called exactly). They just break down a decade of films &#8211; beautiful images, well designed, amazing packages. Also, their Orson Welles book is brilliant: <a href="http://www.phaidon.com/Default.aspx/Web/orson-welles-at-work-9780714845838" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.phaidon.com/Default.aspx/Web/orson-wel.." rel="nofollow">http://www.phaidon.com/Default.aspx/Web/orson-wel..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/blog/the-2009-onoff-book-award-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-10090</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/?p=4480#comment-10090</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re talking about great movie books, it;s hard to get past Peter Biskind&#039;s &#039;Easy Riders, Raging Bulls&#039; - the story of how New Hollywood came to be in the late 60s/early 70s. Although most of the people quoted in the book have since claimed that he made it up. Probably because he portrays everybody as basically being a coked up egomaniac. He wrote one about the 50s too (forget the name) that was great as well.  
 
Also, I recently read a Walt Disney bio by Neal Gabler that was fascinating. It painted a portrait of Disney as a guy who was never really satisfied with the quality of the studio&#039;s work after Snow White, and who was always reaching for this impossible ideal. Showed him as a really mercurial figure and got past a lot of the myths - cryogenics and being a Nazi and that stuff. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#039;re talking about great movie books, it;s hard to get past Peter Biskind&#039;s &#039;Easy Riders, Raging Bulls&#039; &#8211; the story of how New Hollywood came to be in the late 60s/early 70s. Although most of the people quoted in the book have since claimed that he made it up. Probably because he portrays everybody as basically being a coked up egomaniac. He wrote one about the 50s too (forget the name) that was great as well.  </p>
<p>Also, I recently read a Walt Disney bio by Neal Gabler that was fascinating. It painted a portrait of Disney as a guy who was never really satisfied with the quality of the studio&#039;s work after Snow White, and who was always reaching for this impossible ideal. Showed him as a really mercurial figure and got past a lot of the myths &#8211; cryogenics and being a Nazi and that stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
