Blog

The Dark Knight: Review #2

The Dark Knight: Review #2

What makes Batman such a fascinating hero is his very unheroism.

Related reviews and interviews

The Dark Knight, though flawed and over long, is by some distance the best superhero adaptation of the last 10 years; a serious, studious examination of the comic book mindset and the unique character of Batman.

What makes Batman such a fascinating hero is his very unheroism. Bob Kane’s creation wasn’t a costumed crusader, but The World’s Greatest Detective – a Sherlock Homes influenced investigator who, for all his privileged lifestyle, was very much a Man rather than a Superman. Christopher Nolan, working off the template set down by Frank Miller in the nineties, expanded that sense of Batman’s humanity in his first film, along with the mesh of troubled psychoses that set Bruce Wayne apart from the alien serenity of Clark Kent. But in The Dark Knight he goes much further – examining what it means to be a vigilante ‘hero’, always on the outside, never understood but always ready to do whatever it takes to play the role of hero, even if to be a hero you must, ultimately, become the villain.

So many films have explored the idea of the psychological vulnerability of heroes that it’s become a cliché in itself. But none have done it with the rigorous, unyielding logic of Christopher Nolan, who takes Batman to the very extremes of public service and sacrifice. As Harvey Dent prophetically states, “You die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become a villain.” Nobody, not even Batman, can escape that simple truth.

We’re pitched in full tilt to a Heat-style bank takedown which deftly introduces the capering anarchy of Batman’s nemesis, The Joker. The Joker has grabbed the attention of Gotham’s criminal fraternity who are suffering under the triple whammy of Batman’s street beatings, Jim Gordon’s crusading policework and fearless DA Harvey Dent’s legal challenges. The mob want to look after their money, but The Joker has bigger plans.

In the hands of Heath Ledger, The Joker gets the full Frank Miller makeover. He’s a blistering psychopath – no history, no backstory, just a human wrecking ball come to destroy. His relationship with Batman is an intense dichotomy. Again, the idea that a hero needs a villain is nothing new, but this sense that the hero creates the villain is an idea that the morally ambiguous Batman is in a perfect position to explore. Grant Morrison’s Batman: Arkham Asylum did it in print, and Nolan follows suit, giving the two antagonists plenty of screen time to explore their issues. And if their fights seem to end in stalemate, then it’s not like, say, The Matrix Reloaded, where a series of inconclusive set-to’s served simply as a special effects workshop, but more like an academic argument contested on each other’s bodies: what do you stand for? How well do you know yourself? How far will you go to protect the things you believe in?

But if it’s an argument, it’s a long, meandering one. There are plenty of impressive action sequences (although Nolan still has a problem with the architecture of a fight scene) but there’s lots of fat that could have been trimmed. The film has a shapeless quality, seeming to lurch from one episode to the next while trying to cram in as much of the human details as possible. Aaron Eckhart’s Harvey Dent cops much of the flack for this, segueing unconvincingly from freedom fighter to fucked up proto-anarchist purely because The Joker catches him on an off day and reminds him that life ain’t fair.

But nobody’s perfect, and The Dark Knight’s wonky dramatic structure and occasionally saggy characterisation do nothing to change the fact that, this time, for once, the hype is more or less right.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments (2)

  • So much criticism and yet Christopher Nolan’s Batman still comes out on top? How so? Batman smacks bad criminal, Batman smacks good cop, good cop becomes bad cop, Batman smacks him. Good, bad, who gives a shit, just keep this hollow, shapeless mess rollin’.

    No amount of Hans Zimmer fueled crescendo could make us give a shit about anyone in this film, apart from a sad-sack Maggie Gyllenhaal doing her best to appear affected by emotions and stuff.

    Written by Batshit on August 5th, 2008 at 23:15

  • I completely disagree; here is a film at the pleasing end of the mainstream, and while I certainly think the box offices takings etc would have been marginally smaller without the untimely death of Heath Ledger, and Fox’s typical greedy, money-making outlook on such things, Christopher Nolan’s film was very impressive.

    His are by far the best Batman films out there, for the very reason that they are much darker, much truer to the comics themselves, and I think, pretty good at being more focussed on their characters, as well as encorporating the whole high-action CGI stunts things etc. So I disagree, because I think that Nolan’s characters are actually very easy to feel something for. This time around though, Bale seemed much more in the background than in the first one, and Aaron Eckhart definitely stole the show.

    Written by Laura Smith on August 20th, 2008 at 21:40

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Follow us on Twitter
latest comments
  • I think the relationship between Bad Blake and Tommy Sweet is self-explanatory and has a lot of depth in the film. We...
  • I did actually mention Maya Deren's films, as well as Dali/Bunuel-Un Chien Andalou – for some reason...
    Thom Harris Art On Film
  • A fine piece if you ask me, I think it's got a good amount of depth for the length and plenty of names for...
    Thom Harris Art On Film