Blog

The Great Escape

The Great Escape

Nell Frizzell didn't like Watchmen, but as much as she longed to leave, she stayed in her cinema seat. Should she have walked?

Related reviews and interviews

In a fit of benevolent insanity I accompanied someone to watch Watchmen.

And sweet Lord of CGI blue phalluses, I wish I hadn’t. Even if you loved the comic book (which I can’t honestly say I did, although I did give it another chance after I got home), I don’t know how anyone could have sat through all 163 minutes without thinking that, just maybe, they were wasting their life.

I huffed. I puffed. I complained to the person next to me. I made little forest scene pictures on my skirt with bits of popcorn. I tried to have a nap.

But I didn’t leave.

You see, actually leaving a film is much harder than it looks on paper. Firstly there’s the investment. Even when a film is so dire that your emotional investment begins and ends with wondering when all the main protagonists are going to die, there is the money to consider.

If you have just handed over the best part of a tenner to watch something, it can be more than a little disheartening to walk out half way through. It’s like ditching a holiday when you’ve already paid for the hotel. Or dumping someone just after you’ve finally bought nice underwear.

Secondly, you have the whole social etiquette thing. Just how do you walk out of a film, without offending the person you’re with? And isn’t it terribly rude to shuffle past someone, mid-film, when they haven’t seemed to notice that they are watching pure cinematic drivel?

Well, of course, the only thing is to brazen it out and go full throttle. To date I have walked out of around eight films and have switched off countless DVDs.

These include : Sunshine, Sweeney Todd, Deathproof, Role Models and The Hulk.

I have been tempted to walk out of small, indie, artsy films too, by the way, not only this kind of big box office blasting blockbuster. But – and this is shameful to admit – I get more embarrassed leaving art house films because I think people are judging me.

So, here is my fail-proof, fool-proof method for leaving a terrible film:

Step One: Mutter loudly to your neighbour about how this is “the most misogynistic / the most boring / the least believable / the most patronising / the most violent thing I’ve ever seen”.

Step Two: Quickly eat all your snacks – it’ll make you lighter for the getaway.

Step Three: Use your phone or bike light to subtly pack up your handbag. There is nothing worse than having to crawl back to your seat to pick up your house keys.

Step Four: Don’t lie. As you ask to push past everyone’s cramped and disgruntled knees, just whisper, “Sorry, I’ve got to leave. This is awful”. They’ll appreciate your honesty, and you never know; you might cause a back seat revolution.

Step Five: Whistle the tune from The Great Escape as you saunter off into the distance. Leaving a film, if done correctly, can be like skiving from school, or running away from a terrible date; the rush of adrenaline it leaves you with will far outweigh any guilt, shame or sense of anti-climax.

Good luck, movie fans.

rss icon RSS feed for comments

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments (28)

  • Superb article! Although I don't agree with the 'walking out on Sweeney Todd' part though. :D

    Written by Shaun R on March 21st, 2009 at 12:25

  • Disagree with step 1. Talking through films is never acceptable. Having said that if, you're not enjoying a film, I think I think it makes sense to just walk. It's not worth another hour of boredom. Go and do something more fun.

    Unless you're reviewing it. Then you've got to stay, no matter how much you hate it. It's unprofessional to walk.

    Also, I quite enjoyed Watchmen. It was flawed but not that bad.

    Written by Bobby_Floyd on March 21st, 2009 at 12:34

  • ha!!! i heartily disagree. I would be judging you and if you shone any lights or even said anything to me as you leave i would respond with a disgruntled heartless andv cold steely gaze. Although if you whistled the great escape i might have a little chuckle so point 5 is fine.

    also the last film i walked out on was mutant chronicles……. i think the rest of the audience understood.

    Written by William Gilmour on March 22nd, 2009 at 19:06

  • re Step Two: aren't you actually *heavier* after you've eaten all your snack foods?

    In a cinema, silence really is golden .You're right: people are judging you (and quite possibly wishing ill of you). After all, you're not the only one who has invested the best part of a tenner, and we are all capable of coming to our own, often different, conclusions – something that is made more difficult by distracting interruptions from noisy viewers/walkers. If you feel so strongly about your dislike of a film, then by all means exit discreetly, and then talk about it afterwards or even write a review (although seeing the film through to the end might actually serve to enhance the validity of your views, positive or negative) – but *no-one* wants to hear your voice, let alone your opinions, during the screening itself.

    Written by Anton Bitel on March 22nd, 2009 at 20:57

  • I remember that. I remember Kevin Smith had a right go at him for it – and justifiably so i think. Even more interesting was when Ebert waked out fo "Tru loved" after 8 minutes. He later backtracked a little and watched the whole thing.

    http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/10/dont_read...

    Written by Bobby_Floyd on March 23rd, 2009 at 09:40

  • I'm going to Cannes for the first time this year, and I'm intrigued to see how things work there. I know there's much more of an accepted culture of walking out at festivals (sometimes for timing reasons if nothing else), but it's totally alien to me. The only film I've walked out of (since Sleepless in Seattle when I was about 14) is Tropic Thunder, and that was because I had to leave for some other reason. Although I did hate what I saw…

    Maybe it's an English thing. Actually, I hate it when people clap far more than I do when they walk out. Although I do judge people who walk, for sure. About half the cinema left when I saw The Insider a few years ago. I felt, like, *way* smarter than them.

    Written by Matt B on March 23rd, 2009 at 11:23

  • I've never been too keen on the idea of walking out, mainly because I'm of the belief that you have to have seen something all the way through to be able to criticise it properly. Besides, I think you can have some great fun watching terrible movies – you might have to spend your time in the cinema gritting your teeth in anger (because I don't think it's polite to talk in a screening, no matter how bad the film), but I can't begin to tell you how much fun I've had watching the remake of The Wicker Man with friends at home, or the criminally horrific Blair Witch sequel.

    Written by JW Smith on March 23rd, 2009 at 12:51

  • Ive never walked out on a film although was tempted during Tropic Thunder and Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story. I think I stayed in the latter screening from sheer disbelief.

    The ultimate sin i feel is cocky teenagers who spend an entirely film exclaiming how rubbish it is whilst sitting there and watching it ALL THE WAY THROUGH. I guess they think they will get props from their bros or some crap. I sat through a sold out screening of The Dark Knight where a bunch of these aforementioned shitbags heckled and made fairly offensive comments about Heath Ledger. No one did anything, including me, probably from the risk of physical retaliation. When the lights went up, they revealed themselves as a row of Alex Zane lookalikes. Not particularly physically daunting. I'm sure many of you would resort to physical violence in this situation. Or maybe the better of you would get the staff.

    I agree with JW Smith though, to fully criticise one must bare the whole product.

    Written by Matt Poke on March 23rd, 2009 at 13:51

  • Only two films in recent memory that I would happily have walked out of – Batman Forever (I needed a lift home so I sat it out) and Matrix Reloaded ( I honestly thought it'd get better…more fool me).

    Written by Fortunesfool73 on March 23rd, 2009 at 20:50

  • I've only ever walked out of a film once and that was some random Bollywood picture at LFF. Probably wasn't that bad but I was angry that I was completely hungover and dragged myself up to get to the 9am screening when it turned out to be a piece of trash.

    I never walk out of a screening for a film I have to review as I find writing bad reviews is where you really get to flex your vocab by finding witty ways of explaining how shit it was.

    If you want to walk out but don't want to be judged do what I do and go to sleep.

    Written by Lim Salt on March 25th, 2009 at 13:38

  • Matt, as a 14 year old boy you willingly paid to see Sleepless in Seattle? Was it a dare?

    Written by Lim Salt on March 25th, 2009 at 14:05

  • I never walk out of a screening for a film I have to review as I find writing bad reviews is where you really get to flex your vocab by finding witty ways of explaining how shit it was. <i/>

    Slightly off topic, but I've been thinking about writing about really bad films recently. I'm not sure if I've fallen into a trap. It is easy and fun to slag off a terrible film in "clever" way. Most often this involves coming up with witty/outrageous/convoluted similes and metaphors to describe how bad it is and the old favourite – "makes (insert title of another rotten film here) look like (insert title of publicly acknowledged classic). See reviews of Lesbian Vampire Killers for some recent examples.

    But I keep seeing this formula again and again. The clever put downs that say nothing constructive or new. It is hard with clichéd /dull / uninspired films (I can think of a lot of romantic comedies that fall into this category) to come up with a new approach , but I think this is the challenge. To find something constructive, to get the heart of why it was so bad, to identify the failings clearly.

    I've been guilty of this in the past, but no longer. A cliched films demands a non-cliched review.

    Written by Bobby_Floyd on March 25th, 2009 at 17:26

  • I never walk out of a screening for a film I have to review as I find writing bad reviews is where you really get to flex your vocab by finding witty ways of explaining how shit it was.

    Slightly off topic, but I've been thinking about writing about really bad films recently. I'm not sure if I've fallen into a trap. It is easy and fun to slag off a terrible film in "clever" way. Most often this involves coming up with witty/outrageous/convoluted similes and metaphors to describe how bad it is and the old favourite – "makes (insert title of another rotten film here) look like (insert title of publicly acknowledged classic). See reviews of Lesbian Vampire Killers for some recent examples.

    But I keep seeing this formula again and again. The clever put downs that say nothing constructive or new. It is hard with clichéd /dull / uninspired films (I can think of a lot of romantic comedies that fall into this category) to come up with a new approach , but I think this is the challenge. To find something constructive, to get the heart of why it was so bad, to identify the failings clearly.

    I've been guilty of this in the past, but no longer. A cliched films demands a non-cliched review.

    Written by Bobby_Floyd on March 25th, 2009 at 17:27

  • Completely agree – but I think it can be equally (if not more) difficult to articulate what you find *good* in a film without resorting to similarly lazy cliches (drawn from a limited thesaurus of pro-terms and a repertoire of comparisons). Evaluation (positive or negative) is, as they say, for squids. Analysis and contextualisation are where it's really at, no? Of course, these too may never be entirely divorced from an evaluative stance, but they do tend to reveal a little more about the film itself (as opposed to just about the reviewer, witty or otherwise). "A cliched film demands a non-cliched review", indeed – and filmic cliches themselves need to be both respected and interrogated as the repositories of ideological 'norms' that they most certainly are.

    Written by Anton Bitel on March 25th, 2009 at 20:38

  • Exactly what I wanted to say, but much better put.

    Written by Bobby_Floyd on March 25th, 2009 at 20:58

  • Very interesting and eloquent points. I think cliches can harbour good and bad film reviews and it's pretty much what I try to avoid most when writing even if I sometimes fail miserably. Just personally, I find positive reviews more taxing and sometimes enjoy not only the evaluation of a bad film but also explaining why it didn't work and in order to do that fully you should really stay until the end.

    Written by Lim Salt on March 26th, 2009 at 09:17

  • I walked out of another hideous film the other day, Surveillance by Jennifer Lynch… I went in to that because Watchmen was sold out, apparently it was an inevitable outcome.

    Written by Oscar H on March 28th, 2009 at 15:34

  • OMG – I LOVED Surveillance. I want to see it again it was so good.

    Written by belle@belle.com on March 28th, 2009 at 17:28

  • Surveillance rocked my boat, I think the director inherited quite a bit of talent from her dad.

    Written by theoantichi on March 29th, 2009 at 18:41

  • Perhaps we should adopt the Australian system of money-back if you leave before the first 20 (?) minutes.

    Plus, that way I could get to see the Watchmen title sequence everyone seems to be raving about for free, without having to pay for the inevitable shit-fest that follows it.

    Written by Zuko on March 30th, 2009 at 14:07

  • Perhaps we should adopt the Australian system of money-back if you leave before the first 20 (?) minutes.

    Plus, that way I could get to see the Watchmen title sequence everyone seems to be raving about for free, without having to pay for the inevitable shit-fest that follows it.

    Written by Zuko on March 30th, 2009 at 14:07

  • Is that for real? I've never heard of that but 20 minutes isn't that long to give a film a chance. Do you get your cash back for the snacks bought?

    Written by Lim Salt on March 30th, 2009 at 17:00

  • I don't think this is for real (unless it was introduced in the last decade) – although there was an atrocious Australian slasher called Bloodmoon (1990) that featured a brief "Frightbreak" halfway through during which viewers too terrified by what they were watching could take the "chicken walk" and get their money back. Inevitably, the gimmick backfired – most of the audience reclaimed their their money for reasons other than fright… I think this might even get namechecked in Not Quiet Hollywood.

    No matter what opinion you reach about Surveillance, I think it is fair to say that it traverses a crooked narrative path from beginning to end, so that leaving the cinema early might leave you with a rather misleading impression of the film.

    Written by Anton Bitel on March 30th, 2009 at 22:24

  • Like 'Irreversible'. The nature of the film actually leaves it with a happy ending. Getting past the first half is a struggle though. Slightly altering the topic to DVD. What movies have you simply switched off because life is just too short. For me, the appalling 'Cabin Fever' and the, just didnt get it 'About Schmidt'.

    Written by fortunesfool73 on March 31st, 2009 at 08:08

  • Never walk out on a movie, if for no other reason than this: you can't really critique a film properly if you don't watch it the whole way through – it's kind of a cop-out.

    Written by Midnightmovies on March 31st, 2009 at 09:48

  • I wonder if the australians walked out of Australia. Never walk out of a film, agreed; only time I had to do it was when my kid brother got frightened of Resident Evil 2.

    Written by theoantichi on March 31st, 2009 at 14:06

  • I used to take the same stance with rented DVDs as the cinema; I've paid my money so I'll stick with it, no matter what.

    And then 'The 40 Year Old Virgin' happened.

    Written by Zuko on April 2nd, 2009 at 17:40

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Follow us on Twitter
latest comments
  • Star ratings always come down to subjectivity (not that there is anything wrong with that). Putting it another way,...
    Anton Bitel The Ape
  • Anton – i thought the same thing when I read Alisa's review. It seemed positive but the score seemed low. Alisa...
  • Dissapointing…a bit to much interference from the Disney Suits perhaps?