Blog

UK Film Council – RIP?

UK Film Council – RIP?

Is the proposed plan to axe the organisation in budget cuts the beginning of the end for British film?

Related reviews and interviews

As far as the UK’s cultural sector goes, these are hard times. The health of British film – which has been one of the clear and major growth industries of the past – has been called into question on numerous occasions in recent years, with cries of concern coming from the top to the very bottom of the spectrum.

Today the Department for Culture, Media and Sport has announced plans to ‘merge, abolish or streamline’ 55 public bodies, with the UK Film Council poised unnervingly close to the guillotine’s blade. Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt has proposed axing the UK Film Council with the view to “establishing a direct and less bureaucratic relationship with the British Film Institute.”

While government and Lottery support for film will continue, Hunt has stated that the primary cause for these cuts is the “current financial situation” which has forced DCMS to reassess ”the role, size and scope of these organisations.”

Since being founded in 2000, the UK Film Council has pumped an annual budget of £15 million into the British film industry, part-financing hundreds of films and establishing several initiatives aimed at investing in the future of British film.

For now it’s difficult to gauge just how far the ripples of these proposed cutbacks will be felt, but we want to hear your thoughts – readers, filmmakers, cinemagoers – on this. How do you think this will effect British film in the long run? What does this mean for you as a patron of British cinema?

Look out for the digi-edition of LWLies Issue 30, in which we talk to key British film figures about the state of the industry, which will be going live very soon.

Adam Woodward

Comments (6)

  • The UK Film Council is dead – long live the British film industry! http://bit.ly/as1ss4

    Written by Brett Gerry on July 27th, 2010 at 09:25

  • Talk to a lot of British directors and the conversation always tends to revert back to the foibles of the UKFC – its social conservatism, the control it exerts over projects its funded, its positive discrimination, the jump through hoops mentality its seen to have encouraged in young film-makers. An awful lot of funding bodies have merged or folded over the last few years, and the UK Film Council has become too monolithic and ubiquitous. All roads seem to lead back to it. It was, maybe, a good example of Labour's statist attempt to govern an industry comprised of individual, self-employed businessmen.

    Despite all that, I think its loss is going to be devastating. The film industry is one of the most privileged arenas in our society – notoriously insular, horribly nepotistic. It's inherently an expensive, indulgent pursuit that doesn't reward meritocracy. For its layers and faults and and calcified bureaucracy, the UYKFC was still a redistributive institution. Young, unconnected, non-London film-makers are going to have rely on the Caste of the Big Society from now on.

    Jeremy Hunt, btw, inherited around £12 million the day he was born. Maybe not the best person to head-up a cottage industry.

    Written by tomseymour on July 27th, 2010 at 09:54

  • This is dreadful, shortsighted news. The British Film Council is a major part of sustaining our film industry- an industry that provides thousands of jobs, actually supports our economy (for every £1 spent, £5 is returned to the box office) and ensures we are one of the major global players in terms of film-making. I agree that the UKFC is not perfect – some of the pay packets for its senior players are ridiculous and desperately need looking at – but to simply scrap the entire organization without consulting those involved is frankly ridiculous – a knee-jerk reaction from a govenment apparently determined to send us into a double-recession Fantastic work, Hunt.

    I work for http://www.bestforfilm.com, and we set up a save the UKFC petition – if you agree that this decision needs to be re-considered, please please sign it here – http://www.gopetition.co.uk/petitions/save-the-uk...

    Written by Natasha Hodgson on July 27th, 2010 at 09:57

  • Forgive me, it was £4 million, not £12 million. But he did claim 1p on a 12 second phone call on parliamentary expenses…

    Written by tomseymour on July 27th, 2010 at 10:07

  • The announcement was very badly handled and not at all clear regarding administering the film tax credits which bring in the bulk of the revenues the UK film industry earns and has left US studios in particular bemused at our incompetent politicians and civil servants at the DCMS. Films spending in the region of $16are like multiple national companies setting up yet
    The.

    Written by Vincent on July 30th, 2010 at 13:36

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Follow us on Twitter
latest comments
  • thats intrigueing. is this perhaps because of the controvesy surrounding the script? i hear also that sylvain...
    morrisman Sylvain Chomet
  • And before anyone jumps that was, “Is the character resemblance Alice’s boyfriend at the end of the...
  • Lol, "blind stubbiness" was a double entendre in an allegoric Michael Finnegan sort of way. As for a...
  • Anton wins for not insulting anyone. Close match though