Interviews

Jaume Balaguero interview

Jaume Balaguero interview

LWLies talk to Jaume Balaguero and Paco Plaza, the directors of Rec.
Interview by Anton Bitel

Related reviews and interviews

LWLies interrogates the writers/directors of diabolically tense Spanish ‘reportage’ horror [REC], unleashed 11th August on double-DVD.

LWLies: [REC] seems to tap into the imagery of the 9/11 attacks. Were you merely exploiting a real event for horrifying effect, or were you making a broader comment on the War on Terror and the role of the media?
B&P: We are very interested in how mass media create the reality. Nothing exists unless you see it on TV. Only what is shown on TV becomes real. Even on TV, the border between reality and fiction is very thin. The way 11-9-01 was shown on TV could be perceived as fiction. Like a Hollywood movie. That’s something to worry about. Very disturbing.

LWLies: Is it true that you shot [REC] in chronological sequence?
B&P: Yes, it’s true. We wanted to shoot the movie the most organic and credible way. The actors never got the complete script, just a few pages with the general story. No dialogues at all. That’s why we needed to shoot chronologically. They were discovering all the details of the story while we were shooting, reacting spontaneously to all the new events. In some way, the movie was growing by itself. We needed just to control it.

LWLies: How did you conceptualise the film’s fictional viewers? And what rationale motivated your decision (in one of the film’s most paradoxical sequences) to show the shot footage actually rewinding and then replaying (something which, of course, no ‘live’ recording could actually capture)?
B&P: We never thought of a live TV experience. In fact, they are just shooting real stuff in order to edit the show subsequently. And we refused the idea of the typical “found tape” resort. What we wanted is to let the audience be the lenses of the camera. It’s just a special point of view: you are the camera.

LWLies: What were you trying to do with the final act of the film – apart from scare the pants off us?
B&P: For the end of the movie, we wanted a special twist. Not just an “infection” story but something more weird. A demonic possession as the origin of the infection was an insane and disturbing idea that could increase the level of fear and tension at the end of the movie. Especially because it’s something totally unexpected.

LWLies: Does it annoy you that American/British viewers are generally reluctant to watch ‘foreign-language’ films? And how closely have you been involved in the production of the forthcoming [REC]-remake Quarantine?
B&P: We have not been involved in the remake at all. They just bought the rights to make it and they did it. Of course we would prefer [REC] to be released in the EU.

LWLies: Any hints as to what will be going on in [REC] 2?
B&P: We are still working on the script. And we can say nothing about it. Too soon. But for sure it’s going to be scarier, more violent, more tense.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Follow us on Twitter
latest comments
  • Joe Carnahan must lie awake at night and wonder where it all went wrong. Narc was such a good low budget noir, with...
    tomseymour The A-Team
  • Fuck me. Matt Bochenski, you must be a barrel of laughs at a party you humorless critic you.
    Snake-Eyes The A-Team
  • The announcement was very badly handled and not at all clear regarding administering the film tax credits...
  • Problem is that Stone thinks he can throw his opinions round without having to worry about consequence. He...