Reviews

Let The Right One In

Let The Right One In

Released
April 10 2009
Directed By
Tomas Alfredson
Starring Lina Leandersson, Kåre Hedebrant, Per Ragnar

Related reviews and interviews

Tomas Alfredson has defied all expectations. He’s taken the most self-reflexive of genres and re-invented it with a single, stunning film. Unquestionably subversive, at times transcendent, Let The Right One In reintroduces the vampire – that creature of myth and madness – to the real world. Gone are the clichés, replaced by a story of uncertain friendship and fragile love, of social reality and dark fantasy.

Based on the novel by John Ajvide Lindqvist, Alfredson’s film takes us deep into the heart of Sweden’s frigid suburbs. Blackeberg, 1982; the cold settles like a steel weight, expelling warmth and life and hope. Scuttling across concrete streets, rundown people lead rundown lives – inmates in a frozen cell.

Oskar (Kåre Hedebrant) is a 12-year-old boy out of kilter with this world. So pale he’s almost translucent, so physically unimposing he’s practically invisible, one strong snowstorm could blow him away. But escape is elusive for Oskar. Bullied at school, he buries himself in a scrapbook of violent murders, friendship substituted for fantasy.

And then one night Eli (Lina Leandersson) enters Oskar’s life and changes it forever. Eli is… different. Her hair is black and matted, her face smudged with dirt. Only a thin pink shirt protects her against the snow. “Don’t you feel the cold?” asks Oskar. “No,” she replies. “Why not?” “I think I’ve forgotten how.”

They meet in a shallow pool of light cast by a streetlamp, a sickly halo thrown over a rusting playground. Outside that light lurks the thick, unknowable night, but inside Oskar finds someone to protect him from the world. Even though there are questions about Eli he can’t answer. Even though a serial killer is stalking the streets of his town. Even though the dangers of that dark night beyond the street lamp have already stepped into the light.

In a genre that fetishises death, Let The Right One In is a film invested with life. It’s an anti-horror movie, a period piece grounded in the struggles of social reality.

Adapting his own book, Lindqvist has been forced to smooth out the kinkier creases. Much of what’s permissible in print is simply too extreme for cinema (like an attempted-rape scene that would land the filmmakers in jail if they put it on screen). So compromises have been made – Alfredson only addresses the novel’s homoeroticism in a single shot, a blink-and-you‘ll-miss-it image that’ll leave you gasping. Likewise, Eli’s accomplice, Håkan, a paedophile in print, now has a more ambiguous (even sympathetic) motive to explain his actions.

But if some of the book’s more conventional horror elements – its Stephen King moments – have been wisely excised, elsewhere it’s harder to explain why certain material has been left out. No reference is made to the fact that Oskar wets himself, and while it’s clear enough that he’s a victim, it’s crucial that we understand the depths of his humiliation before he meets Eli for his later actions to ring true. But if the film is a more timid beast than the novel, Lindqvist and Alfredson have largely succeeded in capturing its essence while tuning out its excesses.

Let The Right One In

Most importantly, Alfredson’s film mirrors the subversive quality of Lindqvist’s book. This is no ordinary horror movie. In a genre that fetishises death, Let The Right One In is a film invested with life. It’s an anti-horror movie, a period piece grounded in the struggles of social reality. When Lacke (Peter Carlberg) and his girlfriend Virginia (Ika Nord) discuss nuclear hysteria and the upcoming elections, these aren’t just real life details (in 1982, a Soviet sub ran aground in sight of a Swedish naval base, and Thorbjörn Fälldin’s government was on the verge of defeat); they’re the kind of details that provide the backdrop to real lives. The town of Blackeberg may be populated by drunks, drug addicts and two-time losers, but they aren’t just stereotypes waiting to be fed to the meat grinder.

So when it happens, when this world lurches on its axis and the killing starts, you won’t – you can’t – disconnect yourself from these characters. Unlike films at the seedier end of the spectrum, you’re not invited to share in the anticipation of death – idly wondering how inventive or aesthetic or exciting it might be – you’re forced to fear it.

This emotional maturity brilliantly strips the film, and the audience, of its moral compass. Without a clear sense of good and evil, Alfredson is able to orchestrate our sympathies with masterful misdirection. Yes, it’s manipulative, but by the time the motive for the killing becomes clear, we feel both Oskar’s sympathy for the killer, as well as Lacke’s anguish for the victim.

That the film is able to enter such murky moral territory is due in part to the fact that it divests the vampire of its glamour. However conflicted screen vampires have been, the image of the undead speaks to our most seductive fantasies – power, immortality, sexuality. But Let The Right One In flips that on its head. Not just because Eli preys on our assumptions of innocence – who, after all, could fear a little girl? – but also because her existence is a small, squalid and lonely one. Eli may be the first vampire you wouldn’t gladly trade lives with.

It’s this juxtaposition between the domestic and the diabolical that gives the film its power.

But if you’re going to introduce a vampire to the real world, sooner or later you have to address an awkward issue: what do you call it? Because we know about ‘vampires’ – we’ve seen them in films – but nobody believes, nobody could believe, that they’re real. Not even if you saw one in an underpass sucking blood from a corpse. And especially not if this vampire was your only friend.

By forcing his characters to face the absurdity, the impossibility, of what they see in front of them, Alfredson deftly crosses a fourth wall. It’s as if, by uttering the word ‘vampire’ out loud, some taboo is shattered, and all the barriers between the real and the unreal, the possible and the impossible break down completely.

Let The Right One In takes us beyond the comfort zone of horror, and perhaps that’s why it isn’t so much scary as disconcerting. The fear of the unknown, the fear of the unseen, the fear of evil – all have been subtly undermined. In fact, the film’s ‘scariest’ scene sees Håkan washing a bucket, tubing and funnel in his kitchen. There’s something about his quiet determination that’s far more disturbing than seeing the same tools employed after he’s strung a young boy to a tree and cut his throat.

It’s this juxtaposition between the domestic and the diabolical that gives the film its power. The classroom, the home, the local pool: these are the tawdry, tedious spaces of normal life. That the word ‘vampire’ should shatter their illusive sanctuary is like a physical violation. And if, on occasion, the scenes of violence that occur here seem almost comically inappropriate to the audience’s eyes, we’re simply sharing the reaction of the film’s characters, struggling to accept what they’re seeing.

At all times, Alfredson’s focus is not on the aesthetic but the realistic. Which is not to say that his film isn’t beautiful. It opens on an image of snowflakes falling like silent angels, conjuring the icy otherworldliness of this innocent, isolated town. It’s these moments of beauty that lift Let The Right One In out of oppressive darkness. At it’s heart, after all, it’s a love story between two people on the brink of childhood; one learning to reclaim it, the other to let it go. It’s in those quiet moments between Eli and Oskar that the real meaning of the film’s title is revealed, referring to the heart, not just the home.

Oddly evocative of Miyazaki’s Castle in the Sky, this love story is all the more heartfelt for its faltering, adolescent uncertainty. When Eli comes to Oskar’s room one night, fresh from feeding, she climbs in behind him. Unable to see her face, he asks her to be his girlfriend. “Will anything change?” she wonders. “No,” he replies. “Then okay.” As they lie there listening to Eli’s heartbeat, the film reaches a moment of pure transcendence where innocence, horror and love each dissolve into the other.

Alfredson and Lindqvist have crafted a modern fairy tale that stands comparison with the work of Hans Christian Anderson and the Brothers Grimm. In its collision of fantasy and reality, darkness and light, love and loss, Let The Right One In has simply swept aside the rest of the genre, and proved conclusively that horror thrills don’t have to come cheap.

Matt Bochenski

Anticipation:

Racked up festivals awards all over the world, picking up unprecedented word of mouth. Anticipation Score

Enjoyment:

A true original: love story, horror film and social drama. At once brilliant in its parts, and more than the sum of them. Enjoyment Score

In Retrospect:

Perhaps could have gone further in exploring the book’s psychosexual subtext, but everything that’s made it to the screen will stick with you. In Retrospect Score

Let The Right One In at LOVEFiLM

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments (5)

  • Really enjoyed the review!!

    "compromises have been made – Alfredson only addresses the novel’s homoeroticism in a single shot, a blink-and-you‘ll-miss-it image that’ll leave you gasping."
    Maybe so, maybe not. There is plenty in the *dialogue* between Oskar and Eli that is suggestive, or even occasionally expressive, of the homoerotic – and there are suggestions
    that Oskar's father too, and even his mother's boyfriend, have male bonds that go a little beyond the homosocial. All these are there to be seen, heard, and unravelled (perhaps on subsequent viewings) – but the point (and it is an important one) is that these remain subtle and understated. It is one of thefilm 's great strengths – although by no means the only one.

    Also, I think you go a little too far in your claim that the film "has simply swept aside the rest of the genre". A horror film does not, merely by virtue of being very good, suddenly become "anti-horror", and the genre (like all genres) has plenty of room for gems amongst the trash. There have been *many* other horror films that privilege the disconcerting and the uncomfortable over cheap frights, and for all its excellence, Let The Right One In is not alone out in the cold…

    Written by Anton Bitel on April 10th, 2009 at 13:07

  • True – slightly guilty of hyperbole in retrospect.

    By the by, I've just finished Lindqvist's second book, Handling the Undead, which sees the recent dead re-emerging from the grave/morgue as society struggles to adjust to what's happening.

    Have to say, I didn't like it at all. There's a religious element to the story which I find utterly unconvincing, but more than that – I think the social argument of the responsibilities that we owe to the 'reliving' falls flat. Unlike LTROI, the requisite horror elements were a crude interruption rather than an elegant extension of psychology and narrative.

    Written by Matt on April 10th, 2009 at 13:33

  • Hello,

    Who cares about the hyperbole, you felt it, you wrote it. I saw the film today and absolutely loved it. I do think it's more fairytale than horror film, some of the Brother's Grimm stories are more horror than fairy tale so I think it's a great analogy.

    I really wasn't bothered that we didn't see that Oskar wet himself, I think I knew kids like him at school (honest it wasn't me) and you just kind of assumed that they were gonna be bullied because they were odd. That's how shitty and brutal bullying is and I really didn't need to know much more than he fantasized about being more 'powerful' or 'macho' to work out why.

    One thing that I don't get, and this might be something for the people who've read the book, which I haven't but…

    There's the one shot of Eli, naked, putting on Oskar's Mum's shirt. It's a really brief, graphic shot of her 'bathing suit area'. I didn't get why it was in there or what it added beyond pulling me out of the film for a minute. I think the story of burgeoning sexuality had already been told. I know there was a glimpse of a scar or something but didn't get it. Any ideas?

    Cheers.

    Written by Joel on April 17th, 2009 at 21:44

  • Spoiler alert, obviously, but: in the novel, 'she' is in fact Elias, castrated (and then some) just before he is turned into a vampire. Hence the scars, and all those comments Eli makes to Oskar about not being a girl…

    Written by Anton Bitel on April 17th, 2009 at 21:58

  • OOOOOOooooooh… I should've read the book

    Written by Joel on April 26th, 2009 at 21:01

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Follow us on Twitter
latest comments
  • Hi I like your blog I though I would allege Ive been a telephone sex person for years and enjoy the business you...
    Kirsten Piraino Il Divo
  • I think the relationship between Bad Blake and Tommy Sweet is self-explanatory and has a lot of depth in the film. We...
  • I did actually mention Maya Deren's films, as well as Dali/Bunuel-Un Chien Andalou – for some reason...
    Thom Harris Art On Film