Midnight In Paris Review

Film Still
Trailer
  • Midnight In Paris film still

Score

Midnight in Paris isn’t a clutch at yesteryear; it’s a statement that Allen still has something left to say.

For a filmmaker as wildly inconsistent as Woody Allen, it’s logical that his most gratifying offering in recent memory is also his safest. Midnight in Paris is as light and powdered as French pastry, but it’s made of more discerning stuff than March’s ensemble dud You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger and the overrated Vicky Cristina Barcelona. Here, through the idyllic prism of the City of Light, Allen goes on a pastel-tinted nostalgia trip that romanticises the past without losing sight of the present.

Owen Wilson and Rachel McAdams play a well-heeled couple who have come to Paris to shop and sightsee ahead of their wedding. Self-confessed ‘Hollywood hack’ Gil’s (Wilson) cultural hopscotch is impeded by materialistic fiancé Inez (McAdams) and her conservative parents, who openly sniff at Gil’s giddy idealism. Then one night, after a tiff with his spouse-to-be, Gil stumbles into an apparent time warp and the Parisian ‘Golden Age’ he yearns to know appears. The 1920s roar back into life.

These recurring midnight flings – where Gil is transported seamlessly to another era to dine, dance and ruminate with his literary idols – are charmingly rendered by Allen. But it’s Wilson who really makes these vignettes sparkle, riffing off the unbridled fancy of Allen’s script and injecting some charisma into the director’s familiarly neurotic surrogate.

The self-absorbed subtext is a little hard to swallow at times, but it’s impossible not to get lost in the cameo-laden bliss of each round of scotch with Ernest Hemingway (Corey Stoll) and every swing with Zelda Fitzgerald (Alison Pill). Yet while it’s a shame whenever Gil (and, by extension, the audience) is inevitably yanked back into reality, his reconnection with the real world ensures that Allen’s inference that navel-gazing and sanctifying the good ol’ days is a futile pursuit hits its mark.

Midnight in Paris isn’t a clutch at yesteryear after all; it’s a statement that Allen still has something left to say.

View 4 comments

Mike

1 year ago
Thought it was dreadful - if it had been written by anyone else it would just be a pointless romcom, but Allen's self-indulgent neuroses somehow make people sit up and pay attention. The characters of his wife-to-be and her parents were pencil-thin (oh, we're supposed NOT to like them - I GET it, Woody!) and so much on-the-nose writing that I was close to walking out, especially at the confrontation between Gil and Inez, when each other's accusations were met with little more than irritation rather than sadness, anger or disgust. I also suspect that the fact it was Paris makes a big difference for most Americans, whose modern image of Paris is pretty much encapsulated by Gil's pretty limited picture of his ideal period. It seemed to be a tick-list of things REASONABLY well-read Americans might be familiar with.

Somewhat charming, yes. A good film? No. A good Woody Allen film? What is that anyway?

Wolfgang Hoffmann

1 year ago
I absolutely loved it! ... and saw it already for the second time. That is really Woody Allen at his best. Of course, I had to think of, what is widely regarded as his greatest masterpiece, Manhattan. In the 70's it was his declaration of love to New York with the music by Gershwin. This time it is his love declaration for Paris with the music by Cole Porter. 40 years on he still can do it. I loved his imagination, great writing, the very good acting by the whole cast , and, of course, the main actor talking, as very often, like Woody Allen would talk had he played the part himself. But Owen Wilson plays it so well and charmingly that in the end it really worked as he filled out the character so well. Woody, we want more of this!

Matt

1 year ago
Seeing this tonight. The mention of a cameo from Hemingway has doubled my anticipation levels.

David Gratin

1 year ago
The production levels were terrific and the acting was fine. The camera was lovely. I can well see how lots of people would love this film. My wife loved it. But I found the syrup too sweet. I'm a huge fan of lots of Woody's work. Some of his films I'd watch again and again. Some of his films are cinema classics. Not many of the more recent ones sadly. I'll still go and see every movie he makes though. But this one was too twee for me.
Comments are closed.