Reviews

Pontypool

Pontypool

Released
October 16 2009
Directed By
Bruce McDonald
Starring Stephen McHattie, Lisa Houle, Georgina Reilly

Related reviews and interviews

LWLies Recommends

With no above-the-line talent or marketing budget, cheapo genre films often stand and fall on the strength of their titles. Whether lurid advert (Cannibal Holocaust) or lucid statement of intent (Cube), it’s an integral way of expressing a film’s individuality. Unfortunately, Pontypool sounds like a gritty Britcom – think Twin Town, but shit – though anyone expecting to see Rhys Ifans getting into ‘hilarious’ scrapes after killing the local mobster’s dog is in for a bit of a surprise.

We begin with sound waves crackling across the screen, as disgraced local DJ Grant Mazzy (Stephen McHattie) intones inanities about a missing cat in his rumbling bass. Then we meet him: an ageing, semi-alcoholic cowboy of the airways who looks like a demonic Bob Dylan, driving to the radio station in a Canadian backwater through the dawn snow. His phone rings. He stops to answer. A distressed woman appears out of nowhere mumbling something he can’t quite catch then disappears back into the darkness. He drives on nonplussed or not caring. Something’s clearly very wrong.

Something’s also very right, though. In every other (for want of a better word) ‘horror’ film ever made, McHattie (the elder hitman in A History Of Violence) would be reaching for his phone when – BAM! – car hits flesh. But writer Tony Burgess (adapting from his novel, the even more stupidly titled Pontypool Changes Everything) and director Bruce McDonald are content to let the chills creep up on us. So when increasingly frantic reports of a zombie-like infection sweeping through the town interrupt McHattie’s show, the tension mounts organically. Pretty nifty when you consider that the film barely leaves the station or introduces us to anyone other than McHattie’s harried producer, Sydney (Lisa Houle), and loyal assistant, Laurel Ann (Georgina Reilly).

Appropriately for a claustrophobic piece that foregrounds sound, Pontypool has also been released, in edited form, as a radio play. Throughout, jingles resembling John Carpenter’s tinny synth scores battle with panicky police announcements; the infected stutter like skipping records; and Claude Foisy’s seesawing piano soundtrack offers a masterclass in menacing minimalism. You can almost watch with your eyes shut. And judging by the dodgy (but sparing) zombie make-up marring the convoluted last act, perhaps you should. It’s not a deal-breaker, though.

Dovetailing wittily with more visceral outbreak efforts such as [Rec] and Diary Of The Dead, this is an immersive film built on inference and interrupted signals rather than cheap shock-jock tactics. But the question remains: why the hell didn’t they call it Dead Air?

Vari Innes

Anticipation:

Is it a Welsh horror? Sounds rubbish. Anticipation Score

Enjoyment:

No, it’s a Canadian horror, and it’s pretty cool, actually. Enjoyment Score

In Retrospect:

It’s quality work no matter where you come from. In Retrospect Score

Pontypool at LOVEFiLM

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments (2)

  • "But the question remains: why the hell didn’t they call it Dead Air?"

    Here's why: because that would obviously mean something. The title, and Mazzy's nonsensical free-associative riff on the word 'Pontypool' in the opening voice-over, are essential to the central premise, given that the source of the film's horror is precisely the arbitrariness of the sign…

    In m y opinion, this is easily the best horror of the year to date, and gets better and better with each subsequent viewing, so nuanced is the screenplay – and McHattie is simply extraordinary. If you see this, do not leave before the closing credits have finished their crawl, as there is a cute (yet confounding) coda in store for you that, indeed, 'changes everything'.

    Written by Anton Bitel on October 16th, 2009 at 12:05

  • agreed, just finished watching, as a Canadian I can tell you how insanely surprised an enthusiastic I am about this film. Its rare that the words' entertaining' 'Canadian' and 'film' all appear together in the same sentence. Love the fact that its rich in allegory yet could be interpreted into a number of different meanings (all of them very contemportary), I watched it with three friends one of them said they thought it was about the way mass communication was inherently propaghanda in a MacLuhanesque 'medium is the message' type arguement, another one thought it was the way that reporting certain stories can actually influence the story and exacerbate the problem (thinking of the American debate over whether reporting on governement anti-terror techniques meant to be kept secret actually made them more vulenerable) or how do you neutrally report on a stock market or financial sector when so much of a stock's value comes from the perception and expectations of it?…and so and so on, and these are all the different interpretations that came from a single viewing, who knows what a second might hold?…very impressed. One of my favourite horror movies in a long long time

    Written by bri1980 on March 10th, 2010 at 13:27

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Follow us on Twitter
latest comments
  • Anton – i thought the same thing when I read Alisa's review. It seemed positive but the score seemed low. Alisa...
  • I operate with these dogs and as far as animal behavior goes, I am a strong believer in nurture and instruction....
    Erickson Gran Torino
  • Dissapointing…a bit to much interference from the Disney Suits perhaps?