Prometheus Review

Film Still
Trailer
  • Prometheus film still

Score

Ridley Scott's sci-fi saga is an overreaching folly that's well worth seeing on the biggest screen possible.

There is a logical flaw at the heart of Prometheus, the jaw-slackening but intellectually wayward new film from Alien director Ridley Scott. Over the course of two hours, billions of light-years and one central mystery, Scott takes us on a journey driven by a single, persistent question: why? It is the question, Scott suggests, that defines us as humans. And yet – tantalisingly? Infuriatingly? Unforgivably? – his film refuses to offer us an answer. “Why?” you will indeed ask. “Find out next week,” the film will reply.

Returning to the science-fiction milieu of previous triumphs – returning, in fact, to the same narrative universe as his 1979 classic if not, exactly, the same cinematic topography – Scott has crafted something spectacular but hollow.

No amount of fanfare can prepare you for the exquisite visual riches of Prometheus. Scott pitches us into his film like a god, spilling the audience from the palm of his hand into a starscape of spinning planets, ion drives and alien technology. Witnessed in vertiginous IMAX, your first instinct is to cower in awe. But it’s not (just) the mystery of the universe that the film is calling to our attention. Prometheus is a hubristic, self-reflexive exercise. “Look at this,” Scott says. And then, “Look at me!”

It is this self-reflexivity, as much as the familiar elements of the Alien universe, that makes Prometheus a film of returns; an Odyssey back towards something that remains out of reach. For the crew of the ship – a rag-tag band of scientists and ambitious corporate officers – it’s a communion with the ‘Engineers’, an alien race who left clues to their whereabouts on Earth many millennia before. For the audience, it’s the chance to relive that original experience, to be brought face-to-face once again with the xenomorphs and wonder whether, this time, anyone will hear us scream.

There are hints and reminders of those previous films littered throughout Prometheus, but for the most part they’re as ossified as the corpses the crew find on the alien homeworld. Shrouded in echoes of other films, it’s easy to judge Prometheus for what it isn’t because it isn’t a patch on the two movies that made the franchise.

Lacking both the iron-clad characterisation and gut-wrenching tension of Alien, or the gung-ho charisma of its James Cameron-helmed sequel, Prometheus relies instead on some careworn horror tactics that see its supposedly hand-picked crew of geniuses doing some catastrophically stupid things. Whether it’s a biologist who greets a new lifeform by trying to pet it like a dog; the expedition leader who gets drunk on the first night; or the ship’s captain who abandons two stranded men to get laid, the film repeatedly, wilfully, stretches credulity beyond breaking point.

In fact, you don’t need to hold Prometheus to the impossible standard of its heritage to find it lacking. It has more in common with Danny Boyle’s Sunshine and Paul Anderson’s Event Horizon than previous Alien movies, and even those comparisons don’t always flatter it.

In part, this is a function, or at least a consequence, of its ambition. Prometheus is as promiscuous with ideas as it is stuffed with spectacle. Faith, humanity, nature, identity – all of them are thrown into the mix alongside the more resonant franchise staples: sex, pregnancy, birth, gender. But where once they were left as subtext, Scott drags them out into the light (or what passes for the light in the dim murk of planet LV-223) where they suddenly look a little thin.

No one should be criticised for trying to up the IQ level of the average blockbuster, but there’s a superficial, sophomoric quality to the film’s intelligence. Like it doesn’t really matter because, hey, no one’s really listening anyway.

And so it comes down to a few scenes and a few performances that really linger in the memory. They propel Prometheus beyond the ordinary (because it is, in so many respects, extraordinary). Michael Fassbender excels as the android, David, who is entranced by Lawrence of Arabia but must somewhere have secreted a copy of Pinocchio. And there is Charlize Theron, supremely icy as the mission commander whose fate clumsily and unfairly casts her as this instalment’s Carter Burke.

But above all there is The Scene. The one that will be talked about but maybe not here. It is the point at which Noomi Rapace’s Elizabeth Shaw escapes the ghost of Ripley, if only for a second, and creates an iconic moment that will forever be hers. You’ll know it when you see it. If you can watch it.

But finally, Prometheus returns to that inevitable question: why? Why make the film? Because there was both appetite and opportunity. Why move away from so much that made the Alien franchise great? Because that was then and this is now. Why set us up for an answer you’re not prepared to give? Because of shameless studio greed. Maybe it will work. Maybe Prometheus will snap more clearly into focus with the hindsight afforded by additional sequels. Maybe the price we have to pay for a future classic is a crushing sense of present disappointment.

Anticipation

When you’re watching the trailer of the trailer of the trailer, you know the hype is unprecedented.

5

Enjoyment

An awe-inspiring, mind-gouging, eye-blazing spectacle of high-pitched disappointment.

3

In Retrospect

Visually and intellectually promiscuous. Creatively unfocused. Narratively dismembered.

3
Out This Week
Still Showing
Recommended*

View 42 comments

Shane

11 months ago
This is what happens when you hire the guy who wrote the last episode of "Lost" :(

Ben

11 months ago
Nice review.

edd

11 months ago
Alien - tried to be a haunted house movie in space - a taught B-movie idea - which blossomed into much more.

Prometheus - tries to be an Epic tale but with subtext being spelt as text, and, all the issues raised in this review, withers into something much smaller.

But the moment I knew something was up; A back eyed marble skinned Human alien stands as a UFO darkens the clouds above him - Wow, that looks amazing AND that looks like some cheesy SciFi cover from the 70s

Paul

11 months ago
Yep ,.. the world of the world is nigh

Craigston

11 months ago
Absolutely spot on and similar to my reaction. There are terrible gaps in logic, story and character motivation. After 'The Scene' (which bored me in all honesty) in question particularly, the film just seems to wither and then waft down to the ground. And the worst thing to describe the film as: boring.

Why were we created? Who cares. Why make this film? God knows.

jvt

11 months ago
It was an appalling farce. Terrible direction lacking any choice or clarity. Risible performances bar one. Absolutely no character arcs. Trite absurdly ernest high school level philosophy. Dialogue from a poor soap opera and a plot that relied on people behaving in a way that was not believable at any point.

The original Alien was a very very well done movie based on an excellent tight smart script. This was not.

Daniel

11 months ago
I've piled a bunch of issues here: http://checkthis.com/4q2a

Also, was anyone else distracted by Giger's recycled Dune designs?

Daniel

11 months ago
I've piled a bunch of issues here: http://checkthis.com/4q2a

Also, was anyone else distracted by Giger's recycled Dune designs?

David Murphy

11 months ago
For a refreshing and different review of Prometheus, go to http://www.davidmurph.wordpress.com

Libby

11 months ago
Did anyone else think Guy Pearce resembled an elderly looking Ted Danson?

Dave Wood

11 months ago
Ridley Scott does 3D CGIporn - it was all hollow spectacle and no substance.

"Why set us up for an answer you’re not prepared to give? Because of shameless studio greed."

Bang on the money. But the studio won't be getting my money for Prometheus 2 or 3. I'll watch Alien and Aliens instead. I had my doubts from the trailer and now wish I'd not bothered seeing this train wreck of a film.

Kai the film geek

11 months ago
Nope I don't agree....movies aren't made to please a fan base...in fact I'd say ...can't be made to please a fan base...you can have all that stuff in mind but you've got to make the film that you want to see yourself....it's his vision....and I didn't think it a bad one...just a rushed one...I'm hoping for a directors cut....which knowing Ridley Scott...there;s a high chance of that...;)...

Memo

11 months ago
Well indeed, thank you for that... But I think Ridley should as a thank you for making him richer than before. At least try to please the Alien fan base community which in the end has made him and the studios RICHER than before and please make a an 80/20 movie 80% prequel 20% new things. I have been waiting for this movie since the question in 1979 surfaced and this is what I get from it????? I know I'm not alone I know in cyberspace Everyone can hear me scream!!!! Don't you fans agree?

Andre

11 months ago
I think the film fails in that everyone expected a tight sequel to the movie. Most punter do not read director interviews etc or even fan sites. Most people will have no idea what LV 426 or LV223 are. And that is where this movie falls down. The geeks might get it but at the end of the day the idea for the movie studio is to make lots of money, not please the geeks. The general public (who will never frequent sites like this) will leve bemused, vaguely entertained, but still wondering why there were no classic aliens.

A sequel is needed just to make the geeks happy. But i fear the general pubic may be less interested and therefore will the film studio really want the expenditure.

Memo

11 months ago
Please help!!!!!

1. In the movie Alien the "architect" is dead on the chair in his ships bridge with his chest burst open.... NOT on the floor inside the Prometheus escape pod.

2. Who will leave the eggs because on this movie there are none.

3. How will the aliens evolve into the real aliens? Will there be a sequel?

4. This should be LV 426 not planet LV 223.

Can someone answer these questions for me?????

Thank you

There seems to be a lot of people that say this is a stand alone movie... I'm sorry but NOT true. If it was not backed up by the original then they should not have made the same ship. Anyways please help thanks

ddp

11 months ago
Maybe Promethues is a massive wind up about popular films. Everyone reacting to this are basically just like the crew of the ship. They're trying to discover more about the creator, they act illogically and they don't like what they find. Ridley Scott should have done the press in his pants dressed as one of those aliens.

The giveaway is the Erich von Daniken feel. It's another of these big budget sequels/prequels to an established late 70s/early 80s franchise which riles people up when it shows more of its less groovy period ideas. It's like discovering that Allan Ahlberg's children's books were really all about swingers.

Gloria Bishop

11 months ago
The film had amazing aspects. Visually the film was stunning, but it did lack a certain coherency. Alien is far superior to the pseudo prequel but I still love the original sci fi film above everything in the last 100 years. Fritz Lang’s Metropols was perfect, no need for CGI. I think this version is really interesting and the sound track is strangely beneficial to the film. http://www.metropolismovie.co.uk

DumDumBoy

10 months ago
What bothers me more and more...Ridley not sitting back at the end of watching a complete final edit and thinking: okay got some really bad acting; some huge lapses in continuity and logic; some of the most redundant dialogue ever written; got enough shots of the crew driving to and from the crash site...yippee I've made a modern blockbuster - all noise and nothing else...sits back and smiles. Goodnight, Mr Scott. Retire before you smudge any more of your illustrious past.

Luke

11 months ago
Upon leaving the midnight showing I was grinning ear to ear but feeling ultimately hollow and unsatisfied, I think your review is spot on.

Fab

11 months ago
I totally agree with the review. I am so disappointed. Script is bad , music is completely out of touch with the movie. Great acting (by all 3 main actors) just cannot save this movie.Shame.

Nikolai

11 months ago
Don't forget Ridley Scott was hired to do Alien. To think that you can out-do your creator is hubris. Is that not the story of Prometheus?

Casper Christensen

11 months ago
Literally couldn't have said it better my self. Thank you :-)

Kai the film geek

11 months ago
While far from being perfect...I loved it....maybe despite it's flaws...it's an epic film that doesn't quite work due to...wait for it...being too short...it feels rushed with limited characterisation...and very view pause for breath moments where we could find out about these people...and maybe start to care a bit more for them...maybe there will be a directors cut then...lol....

Owen

11 months ago
I loved it, warts and all...

peli

11 months ago
That scene with Michael liking Lawrence of Arabia is a straight steal from Wall-E. But the cartoon did it better. Prom is a very average film. You're spot on noting all the incredibly stupid things the characters do. And what happened to the young Guy Pierce that showed up in all the trailers?

Shane

11 months ago
It's awful. One of Ridley Scott's worst films by a long way. Anyone could have made it and the screenplay is utter rubbish. Lindelof should be flogged for writing it. Depressed.

Andre

11 months ago
Chariot of the gods meets Star wards episode1. As a stand alone movie it is fine though not great. As part of a legendary franchise it fails. Many plot holes, many continuity mistakes, no stand out characters, no real horror. The stand out scene the original review alludes to is not gory at all in my opinion. The ending is illogical and insulting. The space jockey scene is a huge mistake which any true Alien fan will be shocked at.

B Keeler

11 months ago
Am I the only huge fan of the original Alien that actually really enjoyed Prometheus? Yes it was dumb, yes there was offish dialogue, yes the pacing was pandered at points (as an event movie it should have been a bit longer, maybe the sequel will be). But was it not incredible in terms of execution - the sets, visuals and acting I haven't really seen anything like before? B-movie body horror, mutating The Thing-like monster horror, constant panic, overwhelming sense of dread? I admit, Alien is perfect because of it's basic premise, a smaller Horror with a capital H (albeit in space), which used proto-slasher codes and conventions to introduce a nasty we hadn't seen before. We live in an age where we've seen everything before, and a lot of this I hadn't seen, nor imagined.

Dwight

11 months ago
I really well and truly got a lot out of this film. First and foremost it was visually incredible, from the vast scope of space to the planet and interior ship designs. I felt a true sense of dread and escalating tension while the ideas of creation and destruction were juxtaposed brilliantly. The engineer themselves looked great, titan like giants and the additional aliens biological weapons were creepy. The Caesarean scene is an instant classic, real tense white knuckle stuff. As for the characters of course not everyone got much development with quite a lot of cannon fodder but then so is the case for Aliens. David is iconic and stole every scene while Charlize Theron and Noomi Repace were equally as good. I think this is a very divisive film that is already unfairly maligned for been compared to Alien when it's a completely different beast. Comparisons to Sunshine (Really underrated film) are just but this is light years ahead of Alien 3 (a mess) and Resurrection (a big mistake) and are people really comparing this to Event Horizon? Unlike that splat fest this is a work of art, it doesn't always work and it's silly in parts but this is as Sci-Fi should be, not Dances with Smurfs.

mr_x

11 months ago
*oops, i meant written by the guy who wrote lost.

mr_x

11 months ago
seriously though, this was written by lost, which is one of the most overrated pieces of 'drama' created in years. its whole point is to pad something potentially interesting out into hundreds of hours. its no wonder this film isnt really about anything. probably doesnt help that its been tooled out for the summer blockbuster market either. and honestly, when was the last really good film ridley scott made? why on earth have we been getting so excited? all it is is hollywood using a built in audience to flog something new, when everyone knows alien ran out of ideas a long time ago. hollywood and ridley scott are sadly all running on empty these days. or too scared to try anything new.

anthony

11 months ago
I just cant understand how the alien burst out of the engineer when he was sitting down in his armour when he was found by Kane etc in the first film? And he wasnt anywhere near where he was found by kane etc.
Also where did all the alien eggs come from by the time the jockey ship was found in Alien? I could go on but i got to go to work this afternoon. Wasted opportunity there i dont rate this one highly at all shame as it came from the directer who started it all.

anthony

11 months ago
One more thing though didnt weyland get killed by a predator in AVP?

Shane

11 months ago
It's a different planet and ship in Alien. Which only leads to lots of other dead ends and unanswered questions. Best to just try and forget the whole thing. It's not worth the hard work.

Morpheus

11 months ago
"It isnt a patch on the 2 movies that made the franchaise?"
Really?
Has everyone forgot that "Alien" when first released was roundly slated for being complete bollocks because a creature that grows from six inches to twelve feet in as many hours was just a tad unbelievable?
Or that Ripley goes back to rescue her cat? which could be infected, instead of getting the hell away from the alien?
Cameron's "Aliens" has major flaws also with characters doing unbelievably stupid things.
Has everyone forgot that "Bladerunner" was a box office flop, had an entire voiceover removed and was completely re-edited?
Prometheus may not be the masterpiece we all wanted, but as a piece of cinema its just as worthy as the first two Alien movies.
Learning the lesson from "The Phantom Menace", the technology doesnt suddenly "upgrade" but has been cleverly matched to the original movies. It all looks part of the same universe and timescale.
It'll stand the test of time and be remembered as a classic.

Shane

11 months ago
Very few movies are perfect. The good ones make us overlook the problems because we're engrossed in the story and characters. Blade Runner is a good example. Even today, being honest, it's a pretty dull film with no particularly likeable characters. It, like the others you mention though, has very solid foundations in a great screenplay which has revealed multiple layers over the years. Prometheus doesn't have that. It has a screenplay that would be embarrassing in a teen slasher flick. There may be a glimmer of an intelligent idea in it somewhere but, boy, there's a mountain of idiocy to wade through to find it.

Terry Long

11 months ago
Although I agree with some points of your review, as you pointed out, there is going to be two sequels. Maybe, (I hope), what we see as plot holes now will make a little more sense once they are released.

Danny Glover

11 months ago
The film had amazing aspects. Visually the film was stunning, but it did lack a certain coherency. Alien is far superior to the pseudo prequel but I still love the original sci fi film above everything in the last 100 years. Fritz Lang’s Metropols was perfect, no need for CGI. I think this version is really interesting and the sound track is strangely beneficial to the film .http://www.metropolismovie.co.uk/metropolis

Danny Glover

11 months ago
The film had amazing aspects. Visually the film was stunning, but it did lack a certain coherency. Alien is far superior to the pseudo prequel but I still love the original sci fi film above everything in the last 100 years. Fritz Lang’s Metropols was perfect, no need for CGI. I think this version is really interesting and the sound track is strangely beneficial to the film .http://www.metropolismovie.co.uk

Danny Glover

11 months ago
The film had amazing aspects. Visually the film was stunning, but it did lack a certain coherency. Alien is far superior to the pseudo prequel but I still love the original sci fi film above everything in the last 100 years. Fritz Lang’s Metropols was perfect, no need for CGI. I think this version is really interesting and the sound track is strangely beneficial to the film. Sorry guys! Wanted to give you guys the right link http://www.metropolismovie.co.uk

ALYH

11 months ago
I don't understand why Prometheus has been so underrated and under praised in reviews. I think some reviewers (LWL exempt) are forgetting that it IS NOT an Alien prequel and should be viewed in it's own right as a stand alone film.

Furthermore are we all forgetting what it is we want from a cinematic experience? I go to the movies once sometimes twice a week and seeing Prometheus was such a breathe of fresh air. It put every other film I'd seen this year right in it's place in terms of cinematic spectacle. I had a fantastic and thrilling two hours and walked out of the screen feeling satisfied and content. It seems that every one wants to pick holes and not let the hype live up to the expectation

ALYH

11 months ago
...... the only bad thing about it was Guy Pierce! The rest was all good
Comments are closed.