Scream 4 Review

Scream 4 film still


Funny, playful and gory by turns, Scream 4 is surprisingly good fun, but no more, please.

Opening with a devious prologue Scream 4 demonstrates confidence and a wry sense of humour. There’s no reinvention of the horror wheel to announce a glorious new age of slasher cinema, but Wes Craven and Kevin Williamson give it a bloody good go.

Eleven years have passed since the potty denouement of Scream 3 and heroine Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell) now makes a comfortable living writing self-help guides. When she returns on a book tour to hometown Woodsboro (the scene of the original crimes) mobile phones start ringing, Ghostface soon appears and, right on cue, fresh victims are sliced and diced.

From the get-go there’s a strong sense of déjà vu. While not strictly a remake direct links with Scream are plentiful and some characters near clones of previous participants. Of the new faces Hayden Panetierre as 'gore geek' Kirby Reed is the best addition, putting in a strutting and, at times, suitably shady performance. Emma Roberts also makes the most of her role as Sid’s cousin Jill.

As for the former teen victim herself, she now possesses a maternal Ellen Ripley-like stoicism in the face of mayhem and gets the best quip – and laugh – of the whole film. "Rule number one of remakes. Don’t fuck with the original." It’s a sweet line given the scene in which it occurs.

Another commendable aspect is the return of proper edge-of-the-seat frights and liberal doses of gore. Craven orchestrates the thrills and chills like the old horror pro he is and in general captures the iconic slasher spirit.

Homage, in-jokes and references are part and parcel of its genetic make up. The most obscure, perhaps even unintentional, is a corpse’s death pose recalling the infamous mutilation of Jack the Ripper victim Mary Kelly.

Just who is running amok and why will keep viewers guessing all the way to the formulaic third act reveal. Yet there’s a surprisingly downbeat assessment of our saturated media-savvy culture and society which might seem a little po-faced and reactionary at first, but recalls the political and social subtext of Craven’s 1972 debut The Last House on the Left.

View 4 comments


4 years ago
Good review of a great film, I'm so glad that Craven, Williamson et al managed to rise above the drudgery of Scream 3 and managed to deliver a worthy sequel. Eleven years? Better late than never!

W. B Bruce

4 years ago
Really, this is a boring and pedantic review of a film losing steam. Reads like someone Someone badly wants to work for Sight and Sound but ffs this won't cut it even here. "There's a strong sense of deja vu" ? When a film is on its third sequel? No shit Sherlock!


4 years ago
I don't think there's anything wrong with the review. It gets the point across and you know where you stand with the film (from the reviewers P.O.V of course). Also I can't see how you've concluded that this sounds anything like a want-away S&S review, because it's so far removed from the S&S style.

Plus, why berate the reviewer for pointing out the films occasional moments of deja vu? Yes its sequel, but not all films will borrow from it's past outings, and personally I'd like to know if and when it does.

Keep It up Martyn. More Please.

Luke Jones

4 years ago
I went to see this film as a compromise and was was conflicted. I wanted to love it, hate and enjoy it... But I just don't know if I did or didn't. The film was alright, but I don't know whether I was expecting more from it or less from it. Argh!
Comments are closed.