Reviews

Star Trek

Star Trek

Released
May 8 2009
Directed By
JJ Abrams
Starring Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Eric Bana

Related reviews and interviews

Corkscrewing past space debris, photon fire and blazing starships, we are sent hurtling headfirst into JJ Abrams’ rebooted Star Trek universe – just minutes before baby James Tiberius Kirk is too. Blasted out of the womb, blasted out of an escape pod, Kirk will never meet his father, who single-handedly crash-courses the decimated USS Kelvin into its Romulan attackers to save his newborn son.

But, briefly and crucially, we do meet Kirk Snr. And it’s surely no accident that Abrams sends a Starfleet captain to an explosive hero-death in the opening scene. It’s more like a symbolic passing. More like a mission statement. More than Bond or Batman, Abrams’ Star Trek is a radical franchise rebirth – as bald as its title.

Handsome but lived-in, Pine looks less like a cardboard jock from The Hills than a hotshot who’s grown up hitting the bottle, the books and the guy next to him.

Speed and style is what Abrams pumps into the heart of Gene Roddenberry’s sci-fi saga. He barely lets the credit sequence cool off before we warp forward a decade to find that Kirk still has battle in his blood. To the soundtrack yawps of the Beastie Boys’ ‘Sabotage’, tween wild-child Kirk joyrides a sports car across the Iowa desert with a police hoverbike in hot pursuit.

We warp again, past Kirk’s teen years. Because we see them all in Chris Pine’s face. Handsome but lived-in, Pine looks less like a cardboard jock from The Hills than a hotshot who’s grown up hitting the bottle, the books and the guy next to him. He’s been slapped by a lot of women and screwed a lot more..

Cocky, impulsive and embarrassingly likeable, Pine’s Kirk is all Good Will Hunting – genius dropout, lost boy, rebel without a cause. Destiny waits for him at Starfleet. His interview involves being dragged drunk and bloodied out of another bar brawl after a fumbled pass at Uhura (Zoe Saldana). Again, Abrams just hits the fast-forward button to assemble the Enterprise crew at Starfleet Academy: Karl Urban’s grumbling ‘Bones’ McCoy, Anton Yelchin’s quizzical Chekov, and John Cho’s sword-slinging Sulu all shine in zippy, colourful intros.

But it’s maverick Kirk’s mirror-twin rivalry with Zachary Quinto’s ice-man Spock that gives Star Trek its gristle. Both are bruised fruit from broken roots, both are played to perfection by Pine and Quinto. Kirk lives in the shadow of a father who was a captain for 12 minutes and saved 800 lives – but was never a part of his son’s life. Spock’s human mother is his only weakness – but maybe his greatest strength. Deadlocked in a silent struggle between his emotional/logical DNA, Quinto’s Spock is another prodigy. He aces the Vulcan Academy, and then snubs them for referring to his human mother as a ‘disadvantage’.

“Who was that pointy-eared bastard?” asks Kirk when they first butt skulls at the Academy. We almost forgot to mention: Star Trek is funny. Very funny. Comedy is Abrams’ big ace card, with Pine’s comic timing bang-on even when the humour is broad as a planet. Bones causes Kirk’s hands to swell to Gondry-esque proportions. Chekov realises he can’t say ‘Wulcan’. Simon Pegg’s Scotty – wonky accent, brilliant line delivery – is accidentally beamed into a grid of Willy Wonka-style water tubes. Even Quinto brandishes a few zingers. “Out of the chair,” he says briskly, as Kirk slump casually in the captain’s seat.

It’s maverick Kirk’s mirror-twin rivalry with Zachary Quinto’s ice-man Spock that gives Star Trek its gristle. Both are bruised fruit from broken roots.

That would be the other thing we forgot to mention: in Abrams’ Trek, Spock is captain of the Enterprise. Writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman shake up the franchise with some fearless redux revelations that will have hardcore Trekkers grating their teeth, while still keeping its grand heritage safely at touching distance. Don’t worry: the guy in the red suit still gets it bad. Bones and Scotty splutter mantras like “Dammit man! I’m a doctor not a physicist!” Or, “I’m giving it all she’s got, captain!” Vulcan nerve grips, short skirts, spirally teleporters… The in-jokes and nods are all there. But Uhura isn’t Kirk’s babe this time.

Cleverly, in just the kind of conceit that was beamed casually into the Trek TV shows on a weekly basis, Orci and Kurtzman work their alternative reality in as a plausible plot point. What they don’t do is come up with much of a story to go with it. Sketching together a flimsy through-line about planet-eating black holes and some MacGuffin ‘red matter’, their script gives Eric Bana’s rogue Romulan thug little to do except sneer and snarl.

Shame, because a great villain would have added depth and drama to the dynamism of Trek’s vibrant young cast. More balls than brains, the film loses its heading on a couple of occasions, chiefly when Kirk is dumped on an ice planet (was that a cough or a ‘Hoth’?) to be chased by B-movie monsters and discovered by a much-talked-about guest from another reality. It’s the one moment where Abrams dares you to call bullshit on his movie. Then, brilliantly, Kirk does it himself.

But mostly, there’s no time to notice the space-rifts, no space to argue the time-rifts. Because as much as this is a Star Trek movie, it’s a JJ Abrams movie. Which means it moves. The unbelievable truth is that few moviemakers in Hollywood can direct action scenes. Abrams made his big-screen directorial debut by turning M:I:III into the longest, most lung-busting action scene in modern cinema.

He stacks action sequences, fitting them together like Lego bricks into one giant superstructure glued together with adrenaline. Think Cruise’s Ethan Hunt crashing out of a skyscraper window, struggling with his parachute, smashing through a window several storeys down, coming to rest on a boardroom table in front of a quizzical janitor, being dragged back out by a gust of wind, crash-landing in a busy highway, chasing a stolen capsule as it rolls between speeding traffic.

Amid the space skirmishes and phaser fights, Star Trek’s classic Abrams action-stack arrives as another dazzling base-jump: Kirk and Sulu freefall from outer space, bullet through Vulcan’s orbit, narrowly avoid incineration, go hand-to-hand with Romulan brutes on a drill-platform in the sky, then survive another freefall to the planet surface – this time without ‘chutes.

Kirk grits his teeth as he falls in a blur towards the ground. Chekov scrabbles at the teleporter controls back on the Enterprise. Spock races to save his home planet from obliteration. Star Trek used to be smarter. But it was never this fast, fresh and exciting.

Jonathan Crocker

Anticipation:

Star Trek meets M:I:III meets Star Wars. Anticipation Score

Enjoyment:

Kirk is a bar-fighting boozehound? Spock is getting it on with Uhura? Beam us up! Enjoyment Score

In Retrospect:

The most purely enjoyable blockbuster of the summer. And we can say that in May. In Retrospect Score

Star Trek at LOVEFiLM

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments (10)

  • Kurtzman and Orci should be kicked out of the writers guild for creating this moronic twaddle. JJ Abrams said at the start of the project that 'this is not your father's Star Trek!'. He was right. It's more 'your Ritalin-addled, slightly retarded little brothers Star Trek'.

    Written by Shane on May 7th, 2009 at 16:20

  • I agree with Crocker’s Review, particularly the point about how funny the film is.

    I liked it. And I hate Star Trek.

    Written by Chris on May 8th, 2009 at 07:45

  • There's a fine line between funny and dumbing down. I think Shakespeare said it best: 'it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.'

    Written by Shane on May 8th, 2009 at 09:25

  • Good article. I disagree with your characterization of the red stuff as a MacGuffin, though. It is not a MacGuffin at all.

    Written by Dan on May 8th, 2009 at 18:59

  • I agree with the review. I'm a star trek fan and this was a spectacular return to form, it had everything I love about Star Trek and more.

    the Red Matter IS a macguffin, the ice planet scene was kinda stupid and the villain was pretty much superfluous, although he did get my favourite line ("Spock! SPPPPOOOOOOOCCCK!").

    I just can't wait to see what Abrams does with the klingons…

    Written by Dan number one on May 10th, 2009 at 22:58

  • If you're a slavish Star Trek purist, you won't like this movie, but it is a good movie nonetheless. It is definitely thin on plot, but long on action with enough comedy to keep it from becoming monotonous. Shakespeare it is not, but then that is not what it was intended to be. The casting is excellent with a few minor exceptions, and the performances range from adequate to excellent.

    Red Matter is definitely a MacGuffin. They practically say as much by just calling it "Red Matter" and never explaining what it is or how it works. They might as well have called it WD-40.

    Written by Major Tom on May 11th, 2009 at 17:08

  • Read the comic . Questions answered. Does everything need to be spelled out to make an engaging movie?

    Written by Still Frank's god... on May 13th, 2009 at 07:53

  • Absolutely not, but you're not going to make $76 million on opening weekend with subtlety and nuance. This is a high-concept summer blockbuster. It's NOT aimed strictly at 13-34 year old males, but they are definitely the primary target audience. Certainly audiences need to learn to think a little more, but you're not going to make that happen with a Star Trek movie. (Arguably you're not going to make that happen with a movie at all, unless you're both very clever and very lucky.) In any case, this is the wrong movie to criticize for spelling everything out.

    Written by Major Tom on May 13th, 2009 at 23:52

  • "Vulcanites" wont be pleased with this movie,and with some justification.
    Since when were the Vulcans portrayed as bigoted racists whose xenophobia stretches to hating human beings?
    In the old trek the facists were usually portrayed by The Klingons,Romulans or mybe even the Borg in Star Trek 2
    Abrahams has did his usual "lets copy 24" trip of throwing in loads of "surprise twists" as he did in "Lost" and MI 3 simply to try and keep things interesting for a computer game geneartion audience.
    The problem with this is that it breaks with basic tennants of the original series and tramples all over the idea of the federation being the peacekeepers in the universe.
    Rodenberry must be turning in his grave.
    Mc Morpheus

    Written by McMorpheus on May 27th, 2009 at 01:10

  • The difference between Star Wars and Star Trek was that: Star Wars was 'dogfights' in space and Star Trek was 'naval battles' in space. Abrams has turned Trek into Wars and, as a result, completely missed the point.

    Written by Shane on May 27th, 2009 at 07:00

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Follow us on Twitter
latest comments
  • Put it this way: I don't think that Scorsese would claim to be Paul Schrader, Bernard Herrmann or Juliet...
    Anton Bitel Shutter Island
  • I'd argue that score, dialogue and casting are not on the "periphery of … direction". I...
    Tony Franks Shutter Island
  • Nice. Two other 'found footage' films I'd strongly recommend are Michael Costanza's...
    Anton Bitel Found Footage
  • "But boy, is the direction on this film is well… clunky is the best term. I challenge anyone to sit...
    Anton Bitel Shutter Island