Reviews

Synecdoche, New York
May 15 2009
Charlie Kaufman
Starring Philip Seymour Hoffman, Samantha Morton, Michelle Williams
Related reviews and interviews
Is Synecdoche, New York self-indulgent? Perhaps. It’s most definitely self-conscious. And self-reflexive, too. It’s over complicated and infuriating. It’s arch, mannered and pretentious. Because this is Charlie Kaufman, and over complicated, self-reflexive and infuriating isn’t just what he does, it’s who he is.
But somewhere inside the hyper-awareness, the metaphors, the in-jokes, the sly smarts and clever quirks is a real film. An ambitious and strange and beautiful film of bold but elusive truths.
Caden Cotard (Philip Seymour Hoffman) is a theatre director and hypochondriac. His wife, Adele (Catherine Keener), has left him to purse her career as an artist in Berlin, taking their daughter, Olive, and her friend Maria (Jennifer Jason Leigh). After a failed affair with his assistant, Hazel (Samantha Morton), Caden takes his troop to a vast warehouse in New York to work on a piece of art that will “stare truth in the face”. As two decades slip by, Caden will recreate a model of the city inside the warehouse, where a concentric cast of actors will play the actors playing the actors playing the actors in the story of his, their and our lives.
This is barely to scratch the surface of a film whose structure is at once as self-contained as a Russian doll, and as free form as a fever dream. Its nearest contemporary is Harmony Korine’s Mr. Lonely, but a better reference point might be Lynch’s Mulholland Drive. While it’s not as dark as that nightmare, Synecdoche is powered by the same kind of rigorous intelligence and uncompromising vision.
But a vision of what, exactly? This is a film that doesn’t yield its secrets easily. Instead, they’re buried somewhere beneath, or perhaps within, the meta-textual layers stretched across this strange, sprawling canvas.
Kaufman is obsessed with the power of artifice. And it’s not just that giant model city – the film is full of odd and arresting details that invite then defy explanation. Look closely, and Kaufman’s chronology is as cracked and splintered as his futuristic city streets. A Zeppelin is rendered in all-too-obvious CGI. Actors age with painfully transparent prosthetics. A children’s cartoon echoes Caden’s subconscious. Fascist clowns herd citizens onto buses for ‘Funland’. Eye drops replace tears. A petal falls from a tattoo. A burning house punctuates the film like a question mark.
But just as you’re beginning to lose yourself completely in this world of actors, fakes and facsimile, the artifice begins to assume its own kind of truth. When there are so many acts of invention, the difference between the ‘real’ and the ‘unreal’ eventually shades into nothingness.
Whatever you make of it, you have to admire Kaufman’s bold, boundless ambition. Is Synecdoche the story of a man losing his grip on reality, or finding his place in it for the first time? Is it about a decline into madness? Or is it a blind leap into the unknown and unknowable depths of the soul?
Certainly, it’s a film that keeps itself at a distance, and that makes it difficult to respond to on an emotional as well as an intellectual level. Anxious and jittery, Kaufman’s direction is consistent with his writing. Scenes are short and restless; dialogue is packed tight together, spat out of the mouth like rotten fruit.
Some people will hate it, and those people will be impossible to persuade. But all art is vanity. To harangue any filmmaker for self-indulgence doesn’t make sense. “You never really looked at yourself,” says Hazel to Caden. But Charlie Kaufman did. In Synecdoche he’s looked at himself, at life and at death long and hard and honestly. And he deserves to be indulged.


















I often have watched Charlie Kaurfman films thinking that they are incredibly self-reflexive.
Written by Gary Purchase on May 15th, 2009 at 11:20
Great, great review. I'm gutted this isn't showing in my town.
Written by Nick Da COsta on May 15th, 2009 at 18:35
Avoid this film, it's sooooooooooo boring, keeping awake was a bloody challenge.
Please Mr Kaufman, get Gondry back! Or at least a good editor to reign in your indulgences.
Written by Jeremy Hornby on May 15th, 2009 at 21:33
One of the best films of the last few years.
After multiple viewings I suddenly got it, and found it to be extremely painful and true.
Written by Gabriel on May 16th, 2009 at 12:56
Anton recommended this so highly I was nervous before I saw it. I'm not entirely sure I've made total sense of it, but when i left the cinema I had the suspicion that I might have just watched a work of genius. Not quite sure yet. Might be wrong, but I massively enjoyed it anyway. Repeat viewing is essential.
Written by Bobby_Floyd on May 20th, 2009 at 20:11