The Dark Knight Rises* Review

Film Still
Trailer
  • The Dark Knight Rises film still

Score

Christopher Nolan's baroque opus is a worthy trilogy closer, both seriously epic and epically serious.

As the dust settles on another manic day in Gotham, a statue is unveiled outside City Hall. It is both a symbol of deep gratitude and a statement of defiance that says whatever the fate of its winged guardian – come siege or storm – Gotham will endure.

There's another layer of meaning here, a humble acknowledgement that Batman is bigger than any one filmmaker, that no man can wear the cape forever. It might be Christian Bale's unmistakable jawline set in bronze, but the mould will soon be recast. For better or worse, the dark knight will rise again.

And yet Christopher Nolan's vision – his hero – has surely been immortalised over the course of this outstanding trilogy. Not for any technical milestones the director has hurdled or because he has made a Batman saga for the ages, but precisely because The Dark Knight Rises is so inextricably rooted in the here and now.

Just as Frank Miller's graphic novel template offered a response to the capitalist hedonism of the late '80s, so Nolan's film addresses contemporary sociopolitical concerns – domestic and international terrorism, economic collapse, the decline of family values, the dissolution of community. A twentieth-century idol repurposed to soothe twenty-first-century ills.

Eight years after the events of The Dark Knight, eight years since Harvey Dent's death ushered in a new era of civil harmony, freedom from organised crime, Gotham is waking up to a new threat. Bane (Tom Hardy) is the city's self-proclaimed reckoning, a menacing, merciless terrorist hellbent on reducing its inherently corrupt citizens (as he sees them) to ashes.

Superficially, Bane's prolapsed facehugger grill and whackjob accent make him a textbook comic book baddie. Crucially, however, his powers (like Batman's) are the result of circumstance, not some misc radioactive blunder or ungodly genetic buggery. He's also endowed with the brains to match his imposing bulk. Make no mistake, though, these newfound nemeses aren't about to settle down for a game of chess. Theirs is a straightforward heavyweight slog, a good honest cheek-bruiser that is stimulating and fatiguing to watch in equal measure.

Batman's greatest battles, of course, have always been with himself. Once a pillar of the society he has sworn himself to protect, Bruce Wayne has become a scruffy, self-pitying recluse, his restless psychosis compounded by the loss of the love of his life, Rachel Dawes. True to the character, he is again painted by Nolan as a deeply flawed protagonist, the tragic victim of his own vigilantism. A monster shrouded in myth and intrigue more typical of his exiled alter ego.

Never has the existential crisis of putting on the mask been examined so intimately. To that end it is Bale – so often overlooked throughout this series – who delivers the standout performance, undoubtedly his finest in the role. Together he and Nolan break Bruce Wayne down, body and soul, slowly, agonisingly, until both man and moniker are ready to be resculpted into something harder, something more robust and resilient than before. In the process our hero is left open to the minxy allure of Anne Hathaway's Selina Kyle, a duplicitous presence whose seductive feminist purr is pacified in disappointingly conventional fashion.

Humanising a silver-spooned billionaire like Bruce Wayne has never felt so pertinent, not least because of the stigma that has become attached to the One Percent in the intervening years since TDK. And yet here is a film without a true emotional hook. An immaculately crafted, fatally clinical last hurrah that's dotted with dazzling exclamation marks, signed off with a mischievous ellipsis and underlined in cold-blooded ceremony.

Nolan's endlessly inventive use of in-camera pyrotechnics, coupled with Hans Zimmer's relentless percussive score, mean that, even at a rump-numbing 164 minutes, TDKR is nothing less than an awesome sensory feast. Not a dime of its estimated $250m budget has gone to waste. There's not a stodgy frame in sight. Neither a single spoken word nor spray of debris out of place. At once seriously epic and epically serious, this is blockbuster filmmaking of the highest order, and nothing more than that.

View 31 comments

Luke Jones

11 months ago
Loved every minute of this movie, despite the fact that Christian Bale is only in it for about 5 minutes (possibly an over-exaggeration).

Mandy

11 months ago
I was a bit disappointed with this one. I felt the story was drawn out and I did get a wee bit bored. That said the cast were excellent, was a bit gutted there was no Catwoman backstory, no context for her, it felt a bit like that role was added on as an afterthought so the film wasn't a complete sausagefest.

DumDumBoy

11 months ago
Christopher Nolan at his most redundant, I'm afraid. Where the subtleties that Nolan can normally draw from high-concept entertainment (Inception)? Where was the humanity (Memento)? Where was the partnership of the real and the artifice (Inception again)? The was loud, vacuous, repetitive, at times criminally mundane. The acting was fine (Joseph and Anne particularly) and Michael Caine was impressively moving for someone who has never bee truly an actor (he is a deliverer). But Christian fails on all levels (the Batman growl is truly absurd). Technically the film (aside from the impressive opening in-flight salvo) was average at best. The sound was absurd, Zimmer's (me do big score) soundtrack lacked any real drama or subtlety. An overlong, average end to a trilogy that has never quite escaped it's shackles. I still wait for a truly great Batman film. Maybe James Cameron can persuade Clint Eastwood to don the cape and cowl for a proper version of Miller's Dark Knight Returns? Until then, Burton's and Nolan's efforts merely suffice.

Jon

11 months ago
I disagree. Especially about the humanity part. Where TDK was more about social and ethical conundrums, this was much more about character,, and I was glad to see Bale given more to do. Christian actually succeeds on all levels. Never going for the big performance that you might expect from a blockbuster . He's been a perfect Batman, by playing it down throughout. What I liked especially about this film is that it dwelt on the fundamental conflict in Bruce Wayne. A man looking for some kind of redemption. Which I think has been handled with subtlety (see) throughout.

Not saying it’s a perfect film though. The score didn’t bother me too much, but I thought Marion Cotillard’s character was a bit poor (not her fault). And I can think of a handful of other nit-picky things.
And it’s not the best of the trilogy. If you're waiting for a truly great Batman film well you must have missed The Dark Knight. It's hard to see how that could be topped.

Oh and the idea of a James Cameron version of the Dark Knight returns with Clint Eastwood is abominable.

I'm Batman!

11 months ago
I just saw this movie and your review left me wondering if we watched the same film. You got your name right Boy....Dum Dum.

Matt Bochenski

11 months ago
Saw this over the weekend. Couple of simple questions that I need answering (SPOILERS!)...

1. After the Evil Businessman has hired Catwoman to steal Bruce Wayne's fingerprints in order to stage a clever-clever financial crime and take over Wayne Enterprises, why does he then have Bane storm into the Wall St stock exchange and take hostages while executing that part of the crime? What's the point? And why, the next day, aren't all the trades that happened during this crime investigated or suspended? This is stupid.

2. How does Bane get Batman to a prison in the middle of nowhere in about 3 seconds? And how, more to the point, does Batman get back from Nowheresville to Gotham when the city is locked down, he has no money and is recovering from a broken back. This is also stupid.

3. Can anyone point me in the direction of a single memorable and/or classic action scene (or any scene) in this film to rank with, say, the Joker freeway truck heist bit from The Dark Knight Returns? I'm betting not.

octopusluke

11 months ago
Hi Matt.

As the last in trilogy, I think that TDKR left so many questions unsatisfyingly answered. It felt like a great deal of sequences were only used as plot continuations, rather than pivotal points.

As for your final question, I actually found the first Batman vs. Bane encounter to be pretty captivating. With no orchestration from Hans Zimmer in earshot, and some unrelenting close-ups, we saw the two battle it out in such a visceral way that was unlike anything else we'd seen in the previous films.

For me, it was the most disappointing of the trilogy, but still a brilliant blockbuster nonetheless.

jon

11 months ago
Plane hijack right at the start was pretty badass. I also like the first fight between Batman and Bane.Not so much visually (although not bad) it was full of menace.

Liz

11 months ago
It's about a guy that dresses up as a bat. I think you just have to go with it

Matt Bochenski

11 months ago
The bit where the guy dresses up as a bat is, like, my favourite thing. It's the rest of it that bothers me.

Matt Bochenski

11 months ago
It's conceptually interesting and it's (reasonably) well put together. But it's not classic for the simple reason that it doesn't count for anything. Who's this guy in the glasses? And what's the dude in the mask all about? And why is Tommy Carcetti in it? You don't know these people so you can't care about them. And if you don't care about them/their cause/their fate, you're just watching this giant machine at work. Which pretty much sums up the experience of watching the whole film.

Jon

10 months ago
But it does count for something. It's about what Bruce Wayne's has to do find peace and about his redemption That's the point of it and you know as much about the people is this one as anyone in the last two. This one was all about Batman and that was plenty.

Matt Bochenski

10 months ago
That specific scene - the plane hijack - isn't about Bruce Wayne at all. It's about a group of complete strangers doing... something for... some reason... and kidnapping... someone. You have know real way of knowing who, what or why. That's why I'm saying that scene (not the whole film) doesn't count for anything.

And also, of all the films, this one most definitely wasn't all about Batman. This is about the rest of the city's heroes having to step up and do their thing, whether that's Robin, Gordon or Matthew Modine.

On a minor side note, how bad was some of the editing? Talk about pulling punches for the rating. (SPOILER!!!!) Matthew Modine's death was shorn of any power at all because of the dumb cut that just showed him lying on the floor.

jon

10 months ago
Fair points. I have been sticking up for it, but there's much that I didn't like. Editing especially. Just not as slick as TDK ( i watched that again last night for comparison). And the way lots of the characters were handled at the end of the film. Bane, Miranda Tate, Modine especially was weak. However, I think there was just more that I liked than diskliked. particularly how Bruce Wayne was brought down and built back up again.

Actress

10 months ago
Is there any chance of a blog style "review 2" like you did for TDK?

Is this review the author or does it represent the LWL collective view and or the Editor's view?

It would be fascinating to hear more on this film from LWL.


Rob Boffard

10 months ago
Not to mention...

Talia Al-Ghul escapes from the pit at, say, age ten, and is helped by Bane, who, judging from his appearance in the pit is about twenty...

In the events in the Gotham, Talia / Miranda doesn't look younger than thirty-five. That would mean about three decades have passed. Which would make Bane a healthy fifty.

Sorry, don't buy it.

Adam LWLies

10 months ago
Hi Actress.

It's my individual opinion, but we may well do a follow-up piece to offer a broader LWLies perspective on the film (and series as a whole).

ilikejoeparker

10 months ago
I liked this film but there were a number of points which bugged me, resulting in the film falling rather short of The Dark Knight. Firstly, which is probably a little unfair comparison, Bane is no where as near as unnerving, spine chilling, nor charismatic as The Joker. I love Hardy but felt it could have been anyone under that mask, dodgy voice in-tow (it really was awful).
The second issue I had were the fights scenes, knew I should never have watched The Raid (Thanks LWL). They seemed infuriatingly slow, viscerally disappointing and unmemorable. Though I liked Anne Hathaway, every kick she did were shown slightly out of shot and the ones she did were highly unconvincing.
Finally, I thought the film as a whole had very few stand out moments that were 'Batmany', some of them looked plain terrible (the part were he is on the Batmobile and jumps past all the police cars was below average at best). The first third of the film dragged, plot holes already mentioned by Matt and clichéd dialogue.

Now I don't want to sound like a troll, I love that people enjoyed this film and it is their favourite of the series, I just can't quite see it. There were brilliant points, some of the acting was series best, the introduction to characters (though that twist was as obvious as a batarang to the face) and some interesting narrative concepts, thought I mainly wanted more Batman. For me, this is on par with Begins, 7.5 and still a must watch for any fan.

Just don't batman an eyelid if you are a little disappointed. Now I'm off to watch Spidey, Parker is a much better name to Wayne anyway.

Actress

10 months ago
Thanks Adam. - not dissing the review, just a general question really given the editor's comments here and the 4/4/4 + "LWL recommends" accreditation.

Adam LWLies

10 months ago
The consensus between us here at LWLies is that this is a deeply flawed film. But to go into those flaws (much of which, as you can read above, are plot/charter-based) would be to give away too much about the film, and I wanted to avoid writing a spoiler-heavy review. All the more reason for a follow-up piece, perhaps...

jon

10 months ago
Was thinking about the Avengers the other day. Full of plot holes, inconsistencies and things that just don't make sense (with the Hulk especially), but it didn't get half the flak that TDKR is getting.

Watched it again last night, and possibly enjoyed it even more (which is rare). There's so much that Nolan gets right, I think it's unfair to focus so much (and I'm talking mainly about other some other reviewers here) on the small things he got wrong. I'm not saying they shouldn't be called out, only that they're in perspective. LWL always gives a fair and unbiased review, but I've got the impression that many other critics were gunning for this before it came out.

Matt Bochenski

10 months ago
We've talked about that a bit in the office - the fact that TDKR, especially compared to The Avengers, is being given a much harder time. I think part of the problem is that The Dark Knight has gone to great pains to establish its credentials as real-world superhero franchise. It desperately wants to be seen as legitimate - artistically and psychologically. Whereas Avengers is 'just' a comic-book adap. So TDK madfe a rod for its own back. It said, 'I am a SERIOUS film'. So people take it seriously. Unfortunately, that means questioning it down to the details, which in the case of the last film, don't bear much scrutiny at all.

Matt Bochenski

10 months ago
Also, in the first Bane/Batman fight, Bane tells Batman 'I was born in the dark', the proceeds to kick his ass. At the time you buy it, because you're under the impression that Bane is the kid in the prison. But he's not. So Bane is fucking lying, and there's NO REASON AT ALL why he should be able to outfight Batman in the dark. Details, people, Details.

jon

10 months ago
Last one on this, just for fun. Bane may well have been lying. Or could have been speaking metaphorically (he became the man he was in the pit). As for defeating Batman in the dark, well he was a member of the league of shadows before being excommunicated, so presumably had similar training to Batman.

But yes, there are many inconsistencies

Anton Bitel

10 months ago
"I was born ready"

Dutch_Manley

10 months ago
Well, it's not like 'Bane being born in the dark' and 'Bane not being the child' are mutually exclusive events...

Hollie

10 months ago
(spoilers)

Nolan should NOT have humanised Bane. The comic book character's back story is so brutal and profound, why did you have to cut his balls off and let someone barely significant take the credit?

Talia Al Ghul is a very deceptive character so it must be why he did this but...it didn't work! I thought it was unnecessary.

I really enjoyed watching the film and everything else that happens toward the end but was left so disappointed by the baddie twist.

Alec

10 months ago
Great film, but I have to say the editing was particularly awful, to the point where I was completely aware of how bad it was. When this happens I'd beg to say the film is slightly ruined. You shouldn't be sitting there in your seat watching scene after scene hurtle by at breakneck speed. Every time I became aware of the scruffy/fast editing, I missed a few scenes as well, which proves my point.

Ross

10 months ago
Jon you are the only person i saw on this thread making any sense. Avengers has alot alot of mistakes that i could call of my head, TDKR is not perfect but it definitely does not have as much mistakes as Avengers. people need to be fair and stop jumping on the Avengers bandwagon for a moment.

Ross

10 months ago
Matt you look like someone who doesn't read the comics. Bane was born in the Santa Prisca prison so yes he was born in the dark he wasn't lying somethings in TDKR is from the comics so quite with the useless remarks and comments the movie kicked ass

Padraig

10 months ago
Though I preferred TDKR to TDK, for me it still wasn't quite up there with Batman Begins. For me the weight of the franchise rests on the shoulders of the first film; it so completely succeeded in reinventing the Batman franchise and set the tone and bar for the following Nolan releases that the 2nd and 3rd would never completely satisfy on the same terms.

I first saw TDK on release week and loved it as much as anyone else, until I saw it a second time and wondered really whether I'd seen the same film. I found it to have real pacing problems, Christian Bale at his pompous best (or worst?), and during any scene Ledger's Joker wasn't present I was asking "Where did Ledger's Joker go?", so totally does he dominate TDK.

As for TDKR I thoroughly enjoyed it, but I do have issues with it. Hardy was fantastic as Bane, and any voice issues are not as problematic as the "Batman Growl". I'm not his biggest fan but Bale was the best I'd seen him for a long time. Again, there were pacing problems, and no real sense of timing - as Wayne disappears into the hole and shortly after POW it's the depth of winter and Wayne is free again.

None of these problems bothered me as much as - why are the Gotham police such pushovers? Is Blake the only cop who cares? The whole peace time/war time argument doesn't wash for me - it would breed incompetence and sluggishness, sure, but not SUCH complacency as we see here. In the first shoot out, not 20 minutes in, the commissioner and a full SWAT team pursue a gun-toting gang into the sewers. By my count we see 4-5 officers shot down by a sniper, 3-4 BLOWN UP in the sewers, not to mention the Commissioner himself disappears after them. Blake wishes to investigate, but the commanding officer berates him as "a hot head"? And continues to complain about Gordon and his "hot-heads", "We could do with a few less hot-heads around here"? A cinematic convention of city police is that of the biggest gang in town, the "legit gang" that you don't mess with, and will certainly come down hard on a cop-killer. This rings especially true in a film set in what is so clearly an allegory for New York. The Blake character evidenced these ideas perfectly, but what I found hard to believe was that he was the only one. Apparently it takes all 3000 of them being buried alive under the city to galvanise GPD into a willing deterrent. They can push us around, shoot us down, hospitalise us, run us over, make us look like idiots, but burying us alive!? That's just TOO much!

This may sound niggly and specific, but if it is so minor a detail to pick up on then it is surely indicative of larger problems that I haven't noticed. I agree I wasn't nearly so bothered by any issues with the Avengers, which may be unfair, but I also agree that Nolan's Batman wishes to be taken very seriously. Perhaps the fact we are taking it so seriously is an extremely high compliment.

That, and I do not agree for a second that it's a '12'.
Comments are closed.