The Social Network may not have the impact on the world that Facebook has, but when the story is told this well, it doesn’t have to.
One of cinema's greatest strengths is that it can make the ordinary and mundane exciting and adventurous. It’s a rare thing though, and when you see it, sometimes it’s difficult to figure out how it happened. In the case of The Social Network there’s no trick.
Building a website can be slow, tedious work in the real world, but David Fincher turns it into cinematic dynamite through pure, joyous storytelling.
The details of Facebook’s genesis are well known. Zuckerberg and his pals started 'The Facebook' at Harvard, before dropping out and moving to California full time to build the company. Along the way several people feel ripped off/mistreated by Zuckerbeg (the Winklevoss twins and Eduardo Saverin, Zuckerberg’s friend and a founder of Facebook), the site attracts around 500 million users and Zucko, at age 21, becomes the youngest ever billionaire.
From the very first scene, the film sets off at a racing pace to tell this story and it flips quickly through time, focusing on different players in Zuckerberg’s rise or, more accurately, the rise of Facebook. More than anything else it becomes clear that Zuckerberg is Facebook. It’s his passion, his life and his sole focus. As this realisation dawns, the focus of the film changes ever so subtly, and the motivation complex for this dedication is revealed as The Social Network’s real heart.
Playing a real person who is still alive is often a thankless task, with the capacity for epic failure, but Jesse Eisenberg’s approach is fearless and he nails a number of Zuckerberg’s more famous mannerisms – indifference to others (you’re never sure if it’s feigned or genuine), the fast rate of speech and the social awkwardness. Any reputation Eisenberg had among snooty film circles as a poor man’s Shia LaBeouf is dismissed with lines like: "If you guys were the inventors of Facebook, you'd have invented Facebook."
Such remarks are simple but strikingly effective in the hands of Eisenberg, Andrew Garfield and Justin Timberlake, who excels as the energetic but slightly smug and creepy Sean Parker. The history of pop stars-turned-actors is filled with far more misses than hits, but Timberlake really looks like he’s the exception and an emerging acting talent.
And that’s how it’s done: get great actors, get a devastating screenplay – courtesy of West Wing scribe Aaron Sorkin – get a gifted director and tell a brilliant story. This is a look at what it takes to become successful, not a little bit, but mind-blowlingly, once-in-a-lifetime successful. The type of success that changes the world.
The Social Network may not have the impact on the world that Facebook has, but when the story is told this well, it doesn’t have to.
The Secret of my Success meets The Game.
Business hasn’t been this exciting since Gordon Gekko’s first outing.
Little White Lies likes The Social Network.
View 8 comments
Angus
• 2 years agoChris Feathers
• 2 years agoMark
• 2 years agoObnoxious, superficial, generally irritating students obsessed by status; a website is set up; it is immediately successful; some people involved are unhappy, there's a court case; end. Why is this interesting?
Anton Bitel
• 2 years agoIn other words, I think you are being somewhat reductive. If you examined the film's narrative and evolving themes in greater detail, it probably would seem more interesting than just a bare two-line synopsis. "Obnoxious, superficial, generally irritating students obsessed by status" are not people with whom I want spend time in life, but seeing them on screen can make for riveting drama.
Personally, I found the film's characters and dialogue to be amongst its chief pleasures, and I would certainly never call Fincher's direction 'clunky' - but then there is no accounting for tastes. One thing, though, that I do not think is simply a subjective question: in my experience, American students in general, and those from Ivy League colleges in particular, tend to be more articulate than their British counterparts, and I see no implausibility whatsoever in the idea that the student who would go on to become the world's youngest billionaire should be capable of thinking on his feet and talking fast. Of course the film never made the mistake of simply equating their articulateness with having something valuable to say. On the contrary.
Matt Bochenski
• 2 years agoSam Whitehead-Clarke
• 2 years agoThe Moviejerk
• 2 years agoGreg W
• 2 years agoFincher's style is clear to see, very enjoyable, and while it feels every bit a Fincher film, I can't help feeling that his talents were wasted on this.
At the end of the day a few really good performances, a brilliant director, and sound production, can't always save a film from mediocre subject matter.