<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The White Ribbon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/theatrical-reviews/the-white-ribbon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/theatrical-reviews/the-white-ribbon/</link>
	<description>Little White Lies is a bi-monthly, independent movie magazine that features cutting edge writing, illustration and photography to get under the skin of cinema.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bochenski</title>
		<link>http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/theatrical-reviews/the-white-ribbon/comment-page-1/#comment-21689</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bochenski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/?p=8345#comment-21689</guid>
		<description>There could be a lake with paddle-boat swans where unwary punters get trussed up and pushed overboard.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There could be a lake with paddle-boat swans where unwary punters get trussed up and pushed overboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Bitel</title>
		<link>http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/theatrical-reviews/the-white-ribbon/comment-page-1/#comment-21686</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton Bitel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/?p=8345#comment-21686</guid>
		<description>Tell you what, though - if anyone builds &#039;Haneke land&#039; the theme park, I&#039;ll definitely be taking that ride...  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell you what, though &#8211; if anyone builds &#039;Haneke land&#039; the theme park, I&#039;ll definitely be taking that ride&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bochenski</title>
		<link>http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/theatrical-reviews/the-white-ribbon/comment-page-1/#comment-21685</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bochenski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/?p=8345#comment-21685</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re not the only person I&#039;ve heard (read) saying that. More than any other Haneke film I&#039;ve seen, this one is hermetic; so precise in its intonations and framing that it becomes almost a slave to the form. It&#039;s airless. I think because of that I can&#039;t buy it is an allegory of evil. Nothing is real enough to carry consequence. This isn&#039;t Germany, this is Haneke land - a place of very specific and clinical evil, but not an evil that can be transmuted elsewhere. Haneke is poisonous, I think, but not infectious. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#039;re not the only person I&#039;ve heard (read) saying that. More than any other Haneke film I&#039;ve seen, this one is hermetic; so precise in its intonations and framing that it becomes almost a slave to the form. It&#039;s airless. I think because of that I can&#039;t buy it is an allegory of evil. Nothing is real enough to carry consequence. This isn&#039;t Germany, this is Haneke land &#8211; a place of very specific and clinical evil, but not an evil that can be transmuted elsewhere. Haneke is poisonous, I think, but not infectious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Bitel</title>
		<link>http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/theatrical-reviews/the-white-ribbon/comment-page-1/#comment-21537</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton Bitel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/?p=8345#comment-21537</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you&#8217;ve ever seen a Haneke film, you&#8217;ll know better than to expect a satisfying resolution to the various mysteries he sets up, but this film comes closer to it than any of his others.&quot; 
 
I&#039;ll say it comes closer! If this were any other Haneke film, the above review would be guilty of a spoiler (or at least a near spoiler) - but the truth is that in this film it is rather obvious from very early on what underlies the mysterious goings-on in the town (thanks to hints, even assertions, from the narrator as to who, broadly, is responible), so there is nothing really to be spoilt. The mystery here is entirely constructed by the villagers themselves in their refusal to confront (and conversely their readiness to deny) what is going on in their midst - and it is in that sense that the guilt is shown to spread beyond the actual perpetrators of the crime.    
 
I liked &lt;i&gt;The White Ribbon&lt;/i&gt;. I admired the rigour and stark beauty of its aesthetic (all those distancing black-and-white long shots), I thought the performances were excellent, and yet - there is little in it that has not been seen before, whether in previous Haneke films (where young people often take a terrible revenge upon the adult world that has engendered them, revisiting it with its own repressed sins), or in any period film dealing with the malice, repression and hypocrisy of the past (and there are many of these). While several Haneke films masterfully induce in the viewer a sense of nervous claustrophobia, to me &lt;i&gt;The White Ribbon&lt;/i&gt; goes beyond being merely stifling to something more like stuffiness, even dullness.   I&#039;ve now seen it twice, and I think that is quite enough for a lifetime - whereas &lt;i&gt;Hidden&lt;/i&gt; I&#039;d happily watch any number of times without feeling, well, just a little bored. Or am I just being as small-minded as Haneke&#039;s provincial characters?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;If you&rsquo;ve ever seen a Haneke film, you&rsquo;ll know better than to expect a satisfying resolution to the various mysteries he sets up, but this film comes closer to it than any of his others.&quot; </p>
<p>I&#039;ll say it comes closer! If this were any other Haneke film, the above review would be guilty of a spoiler (or at least a near spoiler) &#8211; but the truth is that in this film it is rather obvious from very early on what underlies the mysterious goings-on in the town (thanks to hints, even assertions, from the narrator as to who, broadly, is responible), so there is nothing really to be spoilt. The mystery here is entirely constructed by the villagers themselves in their refusal to confront (and conversely their readiness to deny) what is going on in their midst &#8211; and it is in that sense that the guilt is shown to spread beyond the actual perpetrators of the crime.    </p>
<p>I liked <i>The White Ribbon</i>. I admired the rigour and stark beauty of its aesthetic (all those distancing black-and-white long shots), I thought the performances were excellent, and yet &#8211; there is little in it that has not been seen before, whether in previous Haneke films (where young people often take a terrible revenge upon the adult world that has engendered them, revisiting it with its own repressed sins), or in any period film dealing with the malice, repression and hypocrisy of the past (and there are many of these). While several Haneke films masterfully induce in the viewer a sense of nervous claustrophobia, to me <i>The White Ribbon</i> goes beyond being merely stifling to something more like stuffiness, even dullness.   I&#039;ve now seen it twice, and I think that is quite enough for a lifetime &#8211; whereas <i>Hidden</i> I&#039;d happily watch any number of times without feeling, well, just a little bored. Or am I just being as small-minded as Haneke&#039;s provincial characters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
